A Heretic’s Guide to Eternity Part I

I am reading this book now and thinking I will make some comments as I go rather than trying to synthesize it all at the end. That way I can jot thoughts down as they occur.

So this is from pp1-50 where Spencer Burke intros his ideas and seems to lay the groundwork for where he hopes to go.

Some gut reactions and immediate responses:

– Burke seems to be very set on declaring himself a heretic! He argues quite strongly that he fall in this camp and cites others who at the time (eg Luther) were considered heretics, who we now consider mainstream. Will Burke’s ideas be mainstream ina few hundred years time?…

– He makes a distinction between religion and spirituality. In his view people are ‘over’ religion, but into spirituality. If we can move beyond religion to spirituality then we have a better shake of representing what Jesus was on about and of connecting with this generation. I agree that people aren’t all that enamoured with rule bound religion and all that goes with it. Spirituality is sounding a little nebulous though for me…

– It is an intriging question he poses as to when we are no longer covered by our innocence (‘age of accountability’ idea) and are responsible for our own choices and sins. I will read on before making any comment on this.

– Burke is right in asserting that we contextualise the faith to our own time/location/cultural context so it is at times difficult to know what is constant. I am yet to see if he subscribes to the apostles creed or similar, something of a baseline in my own thinking.

– p.19 ‘nowhere does Jesus call his disciples to start a religion’ Yes – true! It seems to be human nature to systematise things.

– p. 29 Question – is God’s grace the centrepoint of faith or has religion become our focal point (idol) I wonder if grace is supposed to be the centrepoint?

– p.36 “throughout history religions have attempted to unify the world by seeking converts to their particular visions of the relationship between human and divine… but more often than not these efforts have been perceived as attempts at dominance, making for an uneasy relationship with the world.” Sounds like a pretty fair take on what we do once we have institutionalised something!

– Burke says religion divides but spirituality seeks common ground. (p.37) Hmmm… kind of a loose description for me…

So far I am interested to see where it goes. Burke suggests he goes beyond universalism in his arguments so I”m curious to see what he has to say.

Is it provocative for the sake of provocation?

Is it actually something we need to hear or is it something we need to reject?

I will confess to reading it with my heresy detector on ‘alert’. When someone announces themselves as a heretic I find myself wanting to know if its a bit of hyperbole or if he is actually charting a new course away from orthodoxy.

I am trying not to read other reviews so that I get a chance to digest it and reflect on it with my own brain. (There are plenty out there much smarter than me who will be making comments!)

lesbian vampire killers dvd download watch erin brockovich in divx download ewok adventure the dvdrip

download lord of the rings the fellowship of the ring the

Booked Out

I had 6 books arrive last week and I want to read all of them!

Its going to be a bit of a challenge to cut thru all in the next few weeks…

I am almost finished The Suburban Christian, a useful and easy to read intro to discipleship in the burbs. I didn’t find much in it that was new and rivetting but for people exploring this topic for a first time this book is a good intro.

As well as the other ‘burbs’ books, I was sent a copy of A Heretic’s Guide to Eternity, so long as I promise to do a blog review of it.

I just read the back cover and it looks like it will be interesting reading. Here’s the blurb:

The general orthodox Christian view of who gets to heaven and who is doomed to hell is based on the notion that we humans have to choose to “opt in” to God’s plan for our salvation by baptism, repentance, prayer and a righteous life. But what if its the opposite – we are all in, from the moment we are born, no matter when or where we live, and we have to choose to “opt out” in order to be excluded from God’s universal grace.

If I were asked to review a book based on that paragraph alone I would probably say the title is a fair one… I am not a universalist and the blurb seems to suggest universalistic theology, or maybe he’s just being provocative… I’ll be interested to follow the argument and see what Spencer Burke has come up with to substantiate his ideas. More about that later.

While in Melbourne Daz gave me a copy of Breaking the Missional Code, which looks like good value and then Steve Smith sent me a copy of True Patriot, a biography of Bonhoeffer, as he said the last few chapters have some valuable insights for the ’emerging church’.

I am a big Bonhoeffer fan, but this book is 300 pages long and written in that ‘mini’-font that is hard to read and harder on the eye!

I’ll write my thoughts as they develop…

(By the way if you are looking to find the cheapest books online then be sure to use fetchbook)

Who Needs Enemas?

In reference to the previous post I offer a well known quote:

“Who needs enemas when you’ve got friends like mine.”

Last week while I was staying at the Hirsch’s place in Melbourne I used Al’s laptop to blog and forgot to log out of my wordpress site…

Of course once he discovered it then it was only a matter of time before he had some fun!

So – yes I do love Hirschy – but this time I am saying it 🙂

Core Issues

Scott has been writing more about the development of the ‘Joondalup thing’.

In his summary of where they are headed he has included a great summary (see image) of how different communities have chosen to describe themselves. For a bigger version of the image click here.

Honestly, at the end of the day there is nothing new under the sun! But the bottom line is still ‘easy to say’ and another thing completely to do.

If real discipleship were as easy as writing some words on a page then there’d be a whole bunch more people ‘doing it’…download midnight in the garden of good and evil divx

Does Size Matter?

I have just started reading Albert Hsu’s book The Suburban Christian and he asks the question ‘do we need to live in the kinds of houses we do or is it just western indiviudalism driving us?’

Its a fair question and I have been reflecting on the answer.

We live in a 4 bed 2 bath home with a study and 3 distinct ‘living areas’ as well as an alfresco area. Currently I am in the study tapping away here while Danelle is watching the Sunday movie in the ‘family room’. (And ironing… couldn’t forget to mention that 🙂 )

It seems like we currently use every space in our home and to some degree I feel like we need them.

Some thoughts…

* Our kids could share a bedroom. At a young age that wouldn’t be a problem, however it might not be so practical for teenagers.

* Our spare bedroom is a guest room and we probably have people staying for 4 or 5 months of the year at the moment, so its kinda important to us.

* Of the 3 living areas one is the common family area – TV, hanging out etc. There is a room dedicated to kid’s play area and Danelle’s computer and then the other area which was originally included as a ‘meeting room’ for church activities has somehow been claimed by Danelle as a ‘scrapbooking room’. (Suddenly I am perplexed as to why I am currently sitting in the smallest room in the house except for the toilet and my wife has two rooms for her activities and associated junk… hmmm…)

* No doubt we could get away with two living areas.

* As a lap top user I don’t really need a study as such, but working for home it does help to have a dedicated (and tidy) space to inhabit.

As I write I remember that one of the primary concerns in designing a house was not simply affordability and functionality, but a large factor is that of resaleability. A 3 bed 1 bath house does not appreciate as much nor sell as easily as a 4 by 2 with all the desired rooms. So some of our choice to live as we do is an issue of financial stewardship. This is a better use of our funds.

We also entertain a heap so having a spacious home makes that much more doable.

So perhaps the questions are:

* what kind of house do we really need to live in?

* what kind of house complements the life we find ourselves called to live? (regular house guests, frequent entertaining and work from home, 2 small kids)

* what kind of house ought we buy (if we can afford it) to use our money wisely?

* how do we walk the line here without simply chasing bigger and better?

I honestly don’t know if we need to live as we do. My take on it is so coloured by my present experience that I find it hard to imagine doing differently. Could we share our home with another family, or even family members? Its hard to imagine a permanent arrangement (we have had Danelle’s folks here for 6 months last year) but again maybe that’s because it is no longer a western concept.

If we didn’t have kids I wonder if we would live in a smaller home? Maybe… or maybe we would build this size house again for financial reasons and have boarders stay. (We have had overseas students live with us at times in our married life.) I would find it hard to justify a big house for two people for ever.

Anyway, just needed to stop and think out loud. Don’t worry if it doesn’t make much sense I just wanted to give some time to reflecting on what I was reading rather than buzzing thru it like I normally do!