Did We Get It Wrong? “The New Conspirators” sets some cats among the pigeons….

newconspirators.jpg

While we were away over Easter I read my copy of The New Conspirators, the latest book by Tom Sine (who will be speaking at the Forge Festival in 2 weekends time and then in Perth after that for a few days)

I don’t have time at the moment for an indepth review, but I will highly recommend this book to anyone exploring discipleship and mission in a changing world.

He surveys what is going on around the world in missional incarnational ventures and then offers some insights into where he thinks we are headed in the coming years. I didn’t warm to the book immediately, as it begins with a fairly generic overview of the fact that the world is changing. However the more I read the better it got.

Right at the start Sine asks what if we got some aspects of our faith wrong over the years?…

– Did we get eschatology wrong?

– Did we get what it means to be a disciple wrong?

– Did we get what it means to be a steward wrong?

– Did we get what it means to be the church wrong?

– Did we get what it means to do mission wrong?

As you might guess his conclusion is… ‘yeah… maybe we did…’

Because Tom is an older guy, (yes – its all relative), has been around a while and his previous books have been widely read he is pretty hard to dismiss. This is not a young punk on a dummy spit, but a thoughtful practitioner asking serious questions. (And yes – they are big questions!)

The New Conspirators is readable without being shallow and has solid depth without being scholarly.

I reckon you should add it to your pile of must reads for 2008.

Pagan Christianity

pagan1.jpg

I never read this book in its first incarnation, so I thought it’d be well worth a look this time around.

I am about half way thru and finding it a decent read, even if it does caricature the established church somewhat. I find this practice somewhat tiring and attimes have considered just putting it back on the shelf.

However the points Viola and Barna make are substantial enough to warrant some serious consideration. The tone is a tad polemic for my liking, but if you are in an established church and willing to be confronted with some pretty challenging stuff about the origins of our much loved rituals and practices then I’d encourage you to read it.

An email from the PC crew today reported that the book has generated a lot of heat to the point of some maybe even holding book burnings. The email then goes on to ask people to buy up big and create support for the book and its message. This email left me cold.

If the book has currency then it will stand on its own two feet. If it doesn’t then it ought to fall. In my observation any time someone sets out to malign and persecute a minority group they only succeed in drawing attention to them and advancing their cause. Chill out PC crew. Let your work be its own advocate.

God Next Door III – The Shape of Suburban Communities

Chapter 2 is entitled ‘A suburban state of mind – suburbia and the private life’

Simon begins by reminding us that suburbia used to be the domain of the privileged few who could move out and escape the city, but more recently suburban living has become synonomous with “dull monotony, political conformity and cultural inferiority”. I must admit it is easy to speak disparagingly of suburbia with its blandness and often shallow approach to life. And yet, part of the reason I find myself so intrigued by this subject, is that this is where the vast majority of us live.

For better or worse we have chosen to live in the suburbs when we could make other choices… Which makes me wonder, do those who lament suburbia, really do so, or does it just make us sound cool if we complain?…

Having said that, there is ‘suburbia and suburbia’. The 3 different suburbs I have spent most of my life in are vastly different. Scarborough has almost an urban feel with the redevelopment that has taken place, the crowded unit developments along the beachfront and the diverse kinds of people living there. By contrast Lesmurdie is the last suburb before you hit bush and for that reason feels semi rural in places. Ironically it is much closer to the city than where we are now in Brighton, but the landscape says ‘country’. Lesmurdie has something of a village feel but it is extremely homogenous in population as well as having a vibe of superiority at times. That might be the wrong word (and I’m sure some Lesmurdieites reading this won’t like it described that way), but I think there is an air about the place that stands apart from the rest of the city. Then there’s Brighton (actual suburb name is Butler) that is a new estate and brings with it all the energy and dramas of that scenario. Each has its beauties and challenges.

Simon writes about how privacy has become a primary concern for suburbanites. He says ‘the critics argue that we’ve gradually moved from a collective privacy to an individual privacy or what’s been dubbed privatopia’. In our own estate we see some attempts to reverse this with much land given to common areas and community events being provided by the developer. Streets are zoned in older grid like fashion and footpaths are everywhere. This is by contrast with the older suburbs next door where a maze of convoluted cul de sacs mean that you are only ever going to see your immediate neighbours and any passing traffic is likely accidental or unwanted. These suburbs have been acknowledged as ‘design errors’ and it seems unlikely we will be going ack there again!

As mentioned before, the front porch has been replaced by the alfresco area and now entertaining is done out back. ‘Privatopia’ is a good word for how we live. Given you can get home from work open the remote garage door and enter the house by the garage entry door you really can avoid ever having to mix with neighbours.

On the issue of privatopia Simon writes: “Indeed there has been a definite shift from the house in community to the house as private territory. According to the critics, the result is a suburban culture that values the defining of personal boundaries over the nurturing of relationships.”

What’s also interesting is the size and type of houses being built. Clive Hamilton in Affluenza writes that the average Oz home has increased 30% in the last 20 years. It just seems foolish to build a home under 200sqm now! I mean if you go to sell it, who would but it?!! This was a real consideration for us as we built up here. We wanted to make sure we built something that someone would want at a later date. (This economic / resale issue makes the idea of ‘out front’ living areas problematic.)

The various covenants that accompany new estates have the effect of limiting people’s creativity and innovation. Houses all must look alike to some degree and part of that is driven by economic factors. But it does make for a rather drab streetscape. One of the suburbs near us is ‘Quinns Rock’ an area that used to be a holiday village but with development catching up it has been swallowed up into suburbia. There is now ‘old Quinns’ and ‘new Quinns’, with the ‘old’ being a wonderfully diverse collection of houses from the 60’s onwards usually on big blocks of land.

house.jpg

I noticed this house the other day and really liked its vibe, but there’s no way we could build it in Butler…

I wonder what it does to a community when people are compelled to live by certain covenants and required to conform to various standards? I wonder if it actually drains some of the creativity out of the people? Then again most are too busy to be creative anyway.

I’d like to move across to Old Quinns with its eclectic assortment of houses, winding streets and rural vibe, but then that’d mean leaving our own backyard…

God Next Door II – The Lives of Ordinary Neighbourhood People Actually Do Matter Part II

Ok so the ramble continues…

From Innaloo I got married and moved to Glendalough for a couple of years early in our marriage. We lived in a 2 bed flat and then a 3 bed townhouse. Not quite inner city, but definitely high density living! As I look back it is surprising how close we can live and never connect. Not that I had time or interest anyway…

I was too busy being a pastor and running a church to even notice that there were people living nearby. Those first 4 years of marriage saw us move 3 times, with the final one being a house we built in Karrinyup – the place we intended to live for a loong time… We stayed 11 months before we sensed it was time to head up to Lesmurdie.

As a beachlover this was a very foreign place for me, but also a place I came to love. Big blocks, lots of trees and a sense of detachment from the rest of the city was all very nice. But the big blocks meant neighbourliness was lessened as we didn’t often see each other. Many people saw the hills as their ‘retreat’, so coming home after work they weren’t actually seeking to get involved in the community.

That said, the discrete village like nature of the community meant that there was a sense of community but (I am guessing) based more on shared location than relationship. Hills people are interesting. This was a middle-upper suburb, with plenty of very competent, confident people. They were generally very ‘nice’ people, and normal neighbourhood crime and vandalism was much less in this community.

Again I was way too busy with church to really connect with my neighbours (story here), but this time did propel me to a level of dissatisfaction. I became increasingly conscious that our church was a lovely bunch of people, but that most of us who were ‘seriously committed’ to it were not well connected locally. Ironically it was probably those who we (leaders) regarded as slack and at times uncommitted who were usually better connected.

I imagine there is always a balance with these things, but I was quite frustrated by my own tendency to get consumed with the tasks of church – the jobs I did well that usually brought me kudos. No one ever thought well of me for spending time working in the community or having a neighbour for a meal… but a good sermon!… Well now you’re talking.

I imagine a different person could have stayed in that place and worked thru the issues of disconnection and made some shifts. But I wanted to take a more emphatic approach. I wasn’t convinced that I could shift the centre of gravity of my life while still living in that community and working in that church. The church actually gave me permission to get more involved in the community, but sitting alongside the permission was also the unwritten expectation that nothing I was currently doing would suffer.

I do believe God called us to leave Lesmurdie, but at a much more human level I wanted to leave and experiment with church in a different form and in a different place.

Right up until this time I still don’t think I had paid much attention at all to the neighbourhood I was living in. Maybe there were occasional demographic analyses but there wasn’t a sense of buying in deeply.

So then came the move to Brighton and this is where I started to notice the place in which I was living. My first observation when we visited here 5 1/2 years ago was of a barren soul-less place – of the starkly unimaginative look of suburbia – that despite all the efforts of the developer and the house designers to create a vibe.

The ‘vibe’ was distinctly clean, neat and stark in every way. As much as the ads told us ‘its Brighton – what a community should be!’ I think we knew that it was only the kind of community that we chose to make it.

In those early days when everyone was moving into the street there were many spontaneous connections and more than a few street parties. We were responsible for a fair swathe of them as we sought to reverse the trend we had lived with for so long our whole lives. We were operating from the understanding that we ‘live ourselves into a new way of thinking’ rather than ‘thinking our way into a new way of living’.

We did manage to develop a significant feeling of community in our street, but we also observed that after the initial year people ‘settled’ into routines and while we were friendly with each other no one was taking the time to organise the parties, or if they did happen they clashed with other social activities that each of us had on.

For the first few years we were in Brighton the suburb had that new car feel smell about it. Everything was bright and shiny and lawns and gardens hadn’t had the chance to get overgrown. However a growing number of property investors meant that rental properties increased and care of gardens decreased. The kids also grew up and started to want things to do. In the absence of something useful to do they would graffiti or fight. In the last year violence and crime have increased dramatically in this supposedly idyllic little suburb.

For those who stand at a distance I am sure the stunning lakes and parklands are still enticing and seem to speak of a place of beauty and tranquility., but for those of us who live here its just a suburb – a suburb at the end of the line with limited social services and infrastructure – and a growing number of young people who have little to do.

It has also become increasingly transient with around 10% of the houses in the suburb currently up for sale. In our street of 12 houese there have lived 24 different families. I used to know everyone in the street, but a family have lived directly across from us now for 6 months and we have not spoken other than to say a brief hello.

As the street has settled and as neighbours have come and gone there has been a decrease in the desire of all of us to get to know the new people, especially those in short term rental situations. (They are only going to bugger off again!)

As I write there are 4 of left from the originals who bought into the street, but one of those 4 had a real estate agent around yesterday to get a valuation as they have bought closer to the city.

While there is little to get inspired about here, I do feel a strong sense of connection and ownership of this community. I’m sure part of it flows out of my sense of calling, but I’m sure part of it is that I have finally stopped being so busy leading a church and taken the time to really get connected with those we live amongst.

So here I am now in this strange suburb… a disproportionately high number of ‘fly in fly out’ workers, over 50% of the community born outside Oz (mostly UK and SA) and many people working themselves to the bone to make the payments on the enormous mortgage they now have.

Making connections in suburbia is certainly not easy – and its harder for blokes.

The pace of life and the ‘privatopia’ mentality means people may want to connect, but they either lack the time or the desire to get beyond their front door. And then just as you do get to know people they move…

You can understand why many just can’t be bothered.

Anyway, thats a little of my experience of neighbourhood. I could write much more on the current experience, as it the only one I have actually taken the time to reflect on, but if you are interested to know more then you can trawl my archives!

In the next few posts I will return to the book and chew thru some of what Simon has to say…

God Next Door II – The Lives of Ordinary Neighbourhood People Actually Do Matter

This is one of the primary and most inspiring themes of the book.

That God does not value missionaries or pastors any higher than those who work in non-clergy jobs and live ‘normal’ lives. No really… The myth we have lived with for so long, has served to greatly devalue the lives of so many people who love God and neighbour, but feel like they have always lingered a distance from where the main game was being played.

While we say we don’t believe this, our rhetoric often betrays us. I have done it myself – encouraged people to pursue Christian ministry as if it were a ‘higher’ calling – as if other jobs were for those who God had passed over because they were rather ordinary. I know I have hoped that ‘Dave’ would go into ministry because he’d be ‘wasted’ as a teacher…

Where did that come from?…

Simon begins his book with the stories of 3 very ordinary people, living lives that are way short of spectacular. You could even say they are somewhat boring… but as he points out, they are lives that are real & believable and probably very similar to those of most of the people in our churches.

He does this intentionally, because as he says “They embody what this book is about. Its about neighbours and neighbourhoods. More importantly, its a book about you and your neighbourhood. The street where you live and its immediate surrounds is one of the most routine venues of your life. in fact its so everyday that once you’ve moved in, chances are you don’t notice it much…”

Ah, how true…

I know I lived in suburbia for most of my life without giving any thought to how it impacted on my life and my spirituality. Its only been in the last 5 years that I have begun to consider what it means to live and follow Jesus in a specific neighbourhood and how that impacts on my life and the lives of those around me.

Simon observes that as much as our neighbourhoods may seem bland, predictable or unremarkable, they do actually have their own character and qualities. And as we observe these distinctives we can understand better what it means to be the people of God in that place – as ordinary as that may be.

I have lived in several neighbourhoods in my lifetime, the first being suburban Belfast in the late 60’s, early 70’s at the height of the troubles. I don’t find it easy to reflect on that experience of neighbourhood because I was so young and only remember it through the eyes of a child. I do remember thinking I was extremely adventurous in those early years. I felt like I was often exploring and playing in new places. Then I went back to Belfast as an adult at 34 years old and realised how tiny my little world was. I doubt I ever ventured more than a kilometre from home, but I really felt like I explored half the city as a kid.

As I look back on that semi detached two storey house in Orangefield Crescent, I remember a street where we knew the neighbours and the folks across the street, where my grandparents lived within walking distance and where (despite what was going on around us) there was always safe fun to be had. I had some good mates back then so I guess many of my memories are shaped by them.

When we came to Oz we spent 3 months in a rented house in Balga. It was the bad old days in Balga and that was one of my least favourite memories of neighbourhood. I was glad when we moved to Innaloo (yes – a suburb that was the butt of many jokes… no pun intended…) and settled there. I lived there on and off for 16 years until I got married. There was a year in the country town of Wagin and a year at Bible college, but if I had to choose a formative place in my own life it would be that neighbourhood.

In those days it was just another suburb and we certainly didn’t feel anything more than knockabout working-middle type of kids. There was a fair smattering of old fibro state housing commission places around the suburb as well as the standard fare blonde brick that was typical of the era. You really have to wonder what ever caused someone to think blonde brick would be attractive…

We seemed to have pretty decent relationships with the neighbours but because lived on a corner we didn’t seem to get to know too many people beyond that. (Quick observation – Typically corner blocks seem less conducive to knowing people in your street as no-one really knows which street you are on – and you also miss being sandwiched between other sets of neighbours)

In the 70’s and 80’s Innaloo and the areas around it were the suburbs where people worked hard to get ahead and the neighbouring suburb of Scarborough had the reputation of being rather drug ridden – all those ‘surfies’ – as people called them. They were suburbs with big blocks and backyard incinerators. I seem to remember at the height of summer, burning leaves in the old cinder brick incinerator… where were fire restrictions in those days?… or environmental concerns?!…

These days they are expensive suburbs and there is a heap of development happening. Those old blocks are worth a fortune and backyards have been sold off, as well whole houses bulldozed to make way for the new crowd who are moving in. From being a fairly family oriented suburb Innaloo has become very diverse, with young couples buying the units, some 3rd homebuyer families moving backing in, plenty of retirees still sitting on their 1/4 acres and a bunch of lower socio-economic folks still renting the older fibros or red brick dunnies until someone decides to bulldoze them.

I guess if any place where home for me it’d be this area, because it is the neighbourhood where my most formative experiences were had. As much as Innaloo was 4 kms from the beach I still felt like I grew up ‘by the beach’. The ocean views from the soccer oval at Scarborough High School led to many a day of school being skipped in favour of the surf.

Of course back then I wasn’t paying conscious attention to the neighbourhood. I knew we weren’t rich like those people in City Beach, whose houses we would drive enviously past, but neither were on the bones of our bum. Somehow it didn’t matter that much either.

Anyway… its late and as I write I realise I am rambling more than reflecting so I will finish this tomorrow when my brain is re-engaged!…

God Next Door

This book by Simon Holt was one of my top reads of 2007, but the commentary on it has sat in my draft tray until now.

Actually I just this minute picked it up and was about to re-read it, when I thought I ought to give it a mention here.

Mid last year I went into hospital for a sleep study and took it with me, knowing I wouldn’t be able to move for several hours. I read the whole thing in about 2 or 3 hours and found it inspiring and encouraging in its approach to living as the people of God in the local neighbourhood.

Much of what Simon writes about relates to the suburban context and asks what it means for us to fulfil the two commands to love God and neighbour within that setting.

9780908284634.jpg

I am looking forward to re-reading it as it was one of those books I felt a deep sense of resonance with.

I honestly can’t remember much of its specific content but that’s not unusual for me! Most books leave me with a feeling of either being glad to move on or wishing to return – much like a holiday destination. You know the best holiday destinations are the ones you cherish and would like to return to frequently, with friends if possible!

Here are some thoughts from the Allelon review that give you a feel of where the book heads:

Simon raises a lot of questions about churches and their preoccupations … This book doesn’t bash existing churches. It respects the challenges they face. At the same time it is a quiet plea for churches to rediscover neighborhood not as objects of outreach programs or social service good deeds but as the real, flesh and bone place were God takes up residence and meets us all. This is a plea for the rediscovery of the local, the next-doorness of Christian life in a culture that spins us apart in a thousand different directions so that we come home we want to close the gate, move the backyard and escape whatever might be happening on the street.

I had passed this one on to Danelle as I thought it would be just her thing, but it hasn’t made it to the top of her pile yet, so I have pinched it back for some holiday reading!

If you live in the suburbs, and haven’t read it then I’d be making it a top pick for this year.

Leviticus

My memory of how the Bible was formed is that some big councils met and decided which books deserved to be in and which ought to be excluded. Is it possible there was human error in the process?…

All I can say is that they must have voted on Leviticus at end of a night on the grog!

I recently finished reading the Bible thru and have started over, but for the last few days I have been reading this book and genuinely wondering why do we need to have this today?…

I sometimes find myself wondering about the content of the Bible and why God (my assumption is that he was able to direct the councils) would allow some stuff to be ‘in’ and other stuff ‘out’.

I know a friend recently preached about 12 weeks in a row on this book and I’d love to hear what he has to say because right now I think I would be about as well off reading the phone book.

Anyway… a late night rant!

Winton Magic

In the absence of any other decent novels I have begun to read Tim Winton’s Cloudstreet again. It was one of my all time favourites – the story of two wacky families who end up living together in a huge old house and making the most of the raw deal life has served them.

Its a brilliant read with some great characters and some very poignant moments.

I have such a bad memory that reading a book twice is actually no problem. I forget most of what has happened so its like I have a whole new book!

I tend to remember the feeling a book leaves me with rather than the detail, but this time I’m enjoying observing some of the detail in the story.

Blasphemy & Missional Solidarity

Jarrod McKenna

Jarrod McKenna’s Wednesday’s with Gandhi:

“My experience tells me that the Kingdom of God is within us, and that we can realise it not by saying, “Lord, Lord,” but by doing God’s will and God’s work… Do you know that there are thousands of villages where people are starving and are on the brink of ruin? If we would listen to the voice of God, I assure you we would hear God say we are taking God’s name in vain if we do not think of the poor and help them.  If you cannot render the help that they need, it is no use talking of service of God and service of the poor. Try to identify yourself with the poor by actually helping them.”

Mohandas Gandhi, (March 31, 1927) from “Mohandas Gandhi: Essential Writings” by John Dear, p. 81

 

I don’t think there would be many who would argue that as Christians we can affirm with Gandhi that “we are taking God’s name in vain if we do not think of the poor and help them.”

And while Radiohead’s fans are excited the bands been thinking creatively about questions of economics and how they distribute there next album, what does that look like in our lives as God’s people? (economics and justice that is, not so much our next album distribution) Does it look different from the bands PR exercise (not that I’m not stoked Radiohead are letting me decide what to pay for their next album!)

What does it look like to move from ‘church charity’ run by some sweet old ladies, to being ecclesia of missional solidarity?  (not to disrespect radical nannas everywhere doing awesome stuff!)

For you or your community what does ‘doing God’s will’ when it comes to ‘the least of these’ look like? What are you inspired by, that it might look like? What do you long for it to look like?

Our crew have really struggled with this stuff. I don’t mean struggle in the noble sense. I mean struggle in the sense of it being bloody hard! Nearly as hard as living with each other 🙂  And like much of our life as community, it’s left us with not much to show other than some colourful (and painful) stories and a burning desire for God, for healing, for justice, for the kingdom and an awareness of our own brokenness and sin. Should we all move overseas to the slums we have only visited with our expensive cameras? Should we all just join UNOH?  What does it mean to practice hospitality when you’re continually stolen from, physically threatened and taken advantage of?  When all you’re left with is their used needles, hardcore porn, broken promises, and debt. When you show up in court to support them but they dont. When you’re dumped with other people’s toddlers for days on end while they get high and you have to decided do you ring DCD and your only comfort is the lament of the Psalmist and your sisters and brothers prayers. Only to find out that our parts of the body of Christ are bagging you out without praying for you or seeking to correct or encourage you. Please don’t hear me writting these things out of bitterness. I write as a brother struggling with what “actually helping them” (as Gandhi put it) looks like (anybody else?).  Sometimes I come out of visiting in prison and just feel like crying for a day. Maybe these are the stories we need to tell too aswell as the times we come out feeling totally inspired.

Recently I was contacted by a pastor (of what most would consider a successful mainstream church), who had opened up his home to someone who had lived on the streets for years. This Pastor wanted to talk through the heart ache of seeing someone throw away the opportunities offered to him because he was stuck in cycles he couldn’t break out of. Maybe these stories are as important to share as the “success stories”? Maybe these are the stories that can ween us of the quick fixes and easy answers that we can so often hear to our worlds deepest problems. Maybe if we told these ones too we’d celebrate God’s transforming grace all the more! And real joy would truely be our strength.

Some of our crew were recently hanging out with a similar community to us in the States called ‘The Simple Way’. The Simple Way have a huge public influence through the success of Shane Claiborne’s wonderful book “The Irresistible Revolution” (which I highly recommend!!)  But we were joking if we were to write a book it would be “A how [not] to” (shout outs to Pete Rollins who I also highly recommend!!!!).  Maybe our book would be called ‘The Resistible Revolution’ or ‘The Very Resistible Revolution’. 🙂

So for those of us who believe James 2:15-16 is part of the inspired Scriptures what does this look like in a world where 3 billion of God’s children live on less than 2 dollars a day?

Who are a good example of an alternative?  Is Gandhi a good example?  Is St. Francis of Assisi? Is our Lord? (Seriously!) If we say they are (or if we say ‘Jesus is Lord’) what does that look like for us as the church practically?  Who are the communities or people who inspiring you to see Christ glorified in the churches response to  poverty and ‘affluenza’? What churches in your city have encouraged you in the journey by their witness?

Anybody else need to voice failed efforts 🙂 Prayerfully reading the quote from Gandhi, what does God stir in you?

Son of God?

 

 

 

Jarrod McKenna

Jarrod McKenna’s Wednesday’s with Gandhi:

 

 

“Jesus expressed, as no other could, the spirit and the will of God. It is in this sense that I see him and recognise him as the Son of God.”

Gandhi, (October 1941) from “Mohandas Gandhi: Essential Writings” by John Dear, p. 79

How does Gandhi’s understanding of ‘Son of God’ sit with you?

I don’t think Gandhi was talking about the “hypostatic union” of the Father and the Son. I don’t think Gandhi had in mind the fourth Ecumenical Council in Chalcedon considering the two natures of the Son of God. Nor did Gandhi have the Sixth Ecumenical Council in Constantinople and it’s discussion of, not just the two natures, but the two wills of the Son of God.

But in fairness to Gandhi, nor does the average evangelical Christian. While I don’t want to take away from any of the important spiritual lessons that can be learnt from studying the “Councils”, I’d like to suggest it’d be fruitful to consider what another non-Christian probably meant by “Son of God” and what the Apostle Paul meant in context.

The Unnamed Soldier

We don’t know his name. And there is little recorded about him. What we do know: He was a solider who’s job declared “good news”. The Good News of the ‘Son of God’ bringing salvation and justice to the world because he is now Lord of the whole world and calls for our allegiance. I know what your thinking,

“Jarrod, I thought you said he wasn’t a Christian?”

He’s not.

CaesarThat’s the language used by the fastest growing religion in Jesus’ day, the Cult of Caesar. The ‘Cult of Caesar’ announced Caesar as Divine and provided the spirituality for the Empire’s invasion, colonisation, oppression and continual domination. This unnamed soldiers job was his spiritual act of worship, to oversee the brutal and public humiliation of those who would challenge the hegemonic control of the world by it’s true Lord and Son of God, Caesar, the Roman Emperor. The Empire did this through Caesar’s saving methods, means, politics, ethics and spirituality; VIOLENCE. In particular for this centurion, his job was overseeing the violence of crucifixion which made a spectacle of would be revolutionaries that would challenge Caesar as Divine Ruler of the world.

Yet, one Friday the politics, ethics, spirituality and allegiance of this centurion of the oppressive Empire did a radical life changing back-flip. As Mark Gospel records it chapter 15:37-39:

With a loud cry, Jesus breathed his last.

The curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.

And when the centurion, who stood there in front of Jesus, heard his cry and saw how he died, he said, “Surely this man was the Son of God!”

“SON OF GOD?!” These words are not in the mouth of a Jew referring to the rich Jewish imagination associated with this term; the real King of Israel, the real liberating anointed leader (messiah). These words are instead in the mouth of someone who as a Roman Centurion knew the term “Son of God” to refer to his violent political leader, Caesar.

Yet, after maybe watching the death of thousands via crucifixion, something about the cry and the way this nonviolent messiah died, brought him to a conclusion that still threatens the heart of violent empires everywhere (including Burma this week). In this bloodied dying revolutionary he had seen and heard real power. Real leadership. Real sovereignty. Real divinity. The real ruler. The ‘Son of God’ that instead of ruling with violence would expose the “comic backfire” of violence and the structures which have institutionalised it’s reign, making a spectacle of it and triumphing over it “by the cross.” (Colossians 2:15)

Tom wrightAs N.T. Wright has said,

“A close comparison of the “good news” of the Caesar cult with Paul’s words shows that Romans is, among other things, a deliberate parody of the [violent] pagan message. Paul’s readers in Rome must have understood this, and he must have intended them to. Paul’s ideas do not derive from the Caesar cult, as some have suggested; they confront it.”

The Apostle Paul is not, as some liberal theologians have argued, (and sadder still, some evangelicals practice), lifting his ideas from the cult of Caesar worship in an act of political vasectomy to neutralise and hellenise a Judaism that would bow the knee to the Empire’s violent agenda. Instead the Apostle Paul is practicing the nonviolent ‘spiritual jujitsu’, (to nick Wink’s term), that Jesus taught to subvert the language Empire (and it’s spirituality of domination and violence) to expose and undermine it.

The early church, filled with the Holy Spirit, did just that and it often cost them there lives. Much like the unarmed actions of the Buddhist monks in Burma this week, the early church showed a fearlessness in the face of the rebellious principalities and powers. Yet unlike the monks and their brave actions (which I admire deeply) where not simply fueled by the desperation of the situation but by the resurrection of the Son of God; the dawning of God’s nonviolent dream for creation. Unquestionably they understood the cross to be what God has done for us, empowering us to “put away the sword” and to take up the cross as our way of defeating evil (as seen in the early churches refusal to fight wars for first three centuries of Christianity).

Tragically today we even have church leaders who accuse those who challenge the hijacking of Christianity in service the diabolical exploitation of God’s good earth and the poor as ‘twisting the Scriptures’. That accuse those who are calling the church to obey Jesus Christ and therefore love our enemies like he did, (through the way of costly love NOT the way of ‘smart bombs’ and preemptive strikes) of distorting Jesus for our own agenda.

I wonder if the challenge of a pagan solider at the cross of Jesus, the courageous unarmed Buddhist monks in Burma and the context of the Apostle Paul’s writing, will be enough for us to see how often we have made “Son of God” mean less than, (as Gandhiji put it), “Jesus expressed, as no other could, the spirit and the will of God”. More than that, I wonder if the Scriptures will be enough for Christians to believe like the early Church did that Jesus is not less than the Messiah, God incarnate, God revealed fully to be Love.

And calls us to live in ways that reflect such a love as revealed in Jesus.

here is one small way you can support the Burmese Protestors