Perspective

1_19ihv67-19ihv69I’ve been following the unfolding drama of Flight MH370 as it has happened over the last two weeks – a massive tragedy for those with loved ones on board – but at this point I find myself wondering how much more money will be invested in searching for the dead?

I began thinking this a few days after it had disappeared. The prognosis was that it was unlikely for the plane to be found with people alive on it, but as the search has gone on and taken on epic proportions I have become disturbed at how much of our resources have gone into finding ‘dead people’ while millions who are still alive go hungry etc.

Its an ongoing conundrum – I get that – but maybe its past time to say ‘tragic/sad/devastating’ but from here on the money that would have gone into locating the dead will be rerouted into helping those who are close to death, but still have hope.

So maybe that’s not a popular thought, but if I think we sometimes lose perspective.

 

 

Flat Beer or Stale Bread?

323141-kevin-rudd-tony-abbott

 

 

 

 

 

With an election looming these feel like the choices.

It was my first Sunday back teaching at QBC after our break, so I thought I’d launch back in gently… and pick up the topic of ‘how to vote in the coming election’.

As much as some like to avoid mixing their faith and politics I think Ghandi was right when he said: ‘He who says politics and religion do not mix understands neither one.’ We simply cannot be ‘apolitical’ (if there is such a word) in our discipleship. To follow Jesus has political implications and the current hot button of asylum seekers and border protection is a case in point.

So come September 7th we will all vote, but some of us will do it after having moved thru a conscious process while others will simply respond to sound bytes, propaganda and gossip. The question I posed to our crew today was ‘how do you know who to vote for?’

I began by letting people know that Danelle and I are swingers. We have been for a long time and while that might sound odd, we are at ease with it. Of course I’m talking about being swinging voters… That’s what you thought I meant right?…

In the last 30 years I have voted CDP, Liberal, Labour and more recently Green, but I have no allegiance to anyone. Which makes it interesting each time an election comes around. While I have no allegiance I do have a process for arriving at a decision and it is a fairly simple one.

Here it is for what its worth (and this was the guts of what I shared at QBC this morning)

How do we develop a framework for casting a vote that will reflect the priorities of Jesus?

I want to suggest that there is one primary theological lens thru which we can look to assess the merits of the different political parties – and I say ‘parties’ because we are not voting for ‘Rudd’ or ‘Abbott’. These men are not dictators or tyrants – they are subject to the ethos of their own party. So if you don’t like either of them then discard the idea that you are voting for them per se.

That lens I believe we need to look thru if we are vote according to the priorities of Jesus is the lens of the Kingdom of God. The Bible wasn’t written with 21st century western democracy in mind.  Nor was it written for first century imperialism. None of these human forms of government are to be seen as what God ultimately hopes for. They are our best attempts to keep a world in order and keep a society healthy and functioning.

What God had in mind right from the get go in Genesis was a world where he and his creation would live in harmony and where there would be goodness, peace, justice and love. It was the world he originally created. It is the world we – as the church – are seeking to work with him to create at this time. It is the world to come when he restores this world.

It is the kingdom of God. The world where God’s rule is seen and experienced most clearly and powerfully.

So my sole criteria when seeking to decide who I will vote for is to ask ‘whose policies and priorities best depict the kingdom of God?’ Who, if they got in power and were able to get it all own their own way – is likely to move us close to God’s dream for the world?

And what’s interesting is that Godly people can come down in different places on who they see as best moving us in that direction.

But to be able to make that kind of a call you need to be able to both have a grasp of the Bible and also a grasp of what the major political parties are on about. So you do need to do some reading and some thinking.

I think this is where most of us come unstuck. We get sound bytes and propaganda from the various spin doctors but often we don’t take the time to visit the various websites and see who is saying what.

And you need to. Its all there.

So if it’s the kingdom of God as the primary lens thru which we make a decision then we need to know what that means.

If we are envisaging a world formed by God’s rule then we will ask questions like:

  • who best looks after the poor and needy both here and around the world?
  • who will best work to develop a righteous and moral society?
  • who is truthful and honourable in the way they lead?
  • who best calls us and envisions a way to look after the created world?
  • who will best uphold the values of a just and fair society and foster healthy relationships between people?
  •  who will promote strong family as core to the health of a society
  • who will see human rights as a central issue
  • who will protect the rights of the powerless
  •  who will seek peace and healing as ways of resolving conflict and who will avoid war and bloodshed?

And yes – these are complex issues

And there are obviously more, but as you consider the characteristics of the kingdom as described in scripture you can then filter each parties ideas thru that grid.

And the caveat here is that just because a party has Christian in its name, it doesn’t means it is better at envisioning the kingdom of God than those who don’t. Currently neither of the overtly Christian parties take a welcoming / compassionate approach to asylum seekers and for those of us who see this as a significant issue its something of an embarrassment and a puzzle.

So that is the backdrop against which my vote gets cast. Who best envisions a world that looks like what Jesus hopes for?

And the challenge is that many people will prioritise economic development and personal advancement over and above these issues. Because that is in our nature… and because that is in our nature and politicians want to win, they will generally shape their policies to suit our desires.

Its not to say a healthy economy doesn’t matter, so don’t hear me say that – because obviously a country with poor economic health is going to struggle, but I can’t imagine Jesus ever having that as his primary concern – person wealth and societal affluence….

Obviously the hot topic in Aussie politics at the moment is border protection and the treatment of refugees. And both of our major political parties have taken a very hard line on this – which tells you where the bulk of Aussie are at with it. It is an election winner and whoever takes a softer line will not win. And you need to win… even Christians ‘need to win’ apparently…

So – the overarching question is not who can best sustain a western democracy, or who can best effect economic growth, but who can best help us move in the direction of what looks something like the kingdom of God?  (even if they don’t realise they are doing it)

I would suggest to you that this is the core question we need to grapple with each time an election comes around.

And I realise it’s a big question, but I tend to see it as the only question.

The second issue I want to focus on relates to how we determine our vote – an actual process. Because I am guessing many people will feel overwhelmed with the challenge of thinking it thru.

So the next challenge – in how to vote is to put in the effort to make a decision

Think of it as – pray / read / discuss  / pray  / read / discuss / vote

Don’t simply vote in line with family tradition, don’t look for someone with ‘Christian’ in their name and hope they get it right. Don’t simply vote from self interest looking at who will put the most money back in your own pocket. That is not a responsible way to vote. It is selfish. But we do it – see here for the election issues for West Aussies

Choose carefully and be prepared to join the swingers!

Australian theologian John Dickson says:

“Christians should be willing to change voting patterns after Christian reflection on particular policies. A believer who cannot imagine voting for the ”other side” has either determined that only one party aligns with the will of God or, more likely, is more attached to their cultural context than to the wisdom of scripture.”

Its too easy to determine out theology by looking thru the lens of our political ideology, rather than the other way round.

Dickson says we need to avoid polarising arguments and think critically about both our favoured party and the ones we see as less appealing if we are to make a healthy decision. You should be able to find holes in each party’s policies because none of them are perfect. If you can’t then you aren’t looking hard enough.

He has some excellent thoughts here on how to vote as a Christian.

I know that this election I will vote for a party who are ‘for’ some things that I cannot agree with. That is how it rolls…

So will you…

So in that process of pray / read / discuss / pray / read / discuss I am suggesting we:

a) take this seriously and to ask God for guidance in prayer.

b) Then read – firstly scripture – and ask ‘how does the Bible enlighten me on this issue?’ Begin with the sermon on the mount in Matthew 5 and ask who it best describes. But try and reflect on the whole tenor of the Bible and see who emerges.

Then read the websites of the various parties you know are core – read the Libs, Labour, Greens and Christian parties. For fun you can read the Pirate party… the HEMP party and the Sex Party…

c) Then discuss it with friends. Ask one another who you’re going to vote for… And why… Let’s get beyond seeing discussion of politics as taboo. The purpose is not to debate and argue but to understand and respect that different people who love Jesus will vote for different parties at different times.

I know some churches have a party line – there was an article last week in the West about a church’s links with the liberal party and their overt promotion of them as their preferred choice. My mate attends a church that got a very strong message from the Australian Christians about why they should vote for them – and as a church were obviously nailing their colours to the mast.

I am not up for giving my support to any one group because all of them are good in their own way and flawed in their own way. And as a church I believe we are healthier for diversity than for having a party line. My ideal scenario would be to have someone who is going to vote for each of the major parties take some time on a Sunday to give us their reasons for their choice and then allow debate and questioning – kinda like our very own Q&A.

That way we get to really hear the strong and weak aspects of each group. But we won’t be having any one party take the floor to do their thing.

My take is that no one is committed to the kingdom of God as we would hope, (And I don’t think we are as committed to the kingdom of God as we would hope either…)  but that each in their own way are seeking to build a better society.

So while it might feel like a choice between stale bread and flat beer I am hopeful that we can be inspired a bit beyond that…

I haven’t made up mind yet as to who will get my vote. Last time I voted Green, as I felt their justice and environmental policies led us in a kingdom direction, even if I disagreed with their stance on some of the moral issues.  I know this choice had some people question my integrity as a Christian leader. I’m ok with that, as I knew it would happen, but I was disappointed when Bob Brown came out swinging for gay marriage as his first priority.

This time I am puzzled. The asylum seeker question is a significant justice issue and I had hoped Kev would be as good as his word and the do the right thing here, but clearly too many votes are at stake. He has really caved in. Clearly Abbott has no time for them, but at least he has been up front from the get go. The CDP and Australian Christians probably need to have another read of the Bible quite frankly, while the Greens are much more open and compassionate.

Anyway, my hope is that as a Christian community we will take the time, make the effort and use our brains to reach a sensible vote, given that no choice is perfect.

Another Aussie Prophet

9780143300465

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have often wondered whether some of the most potent and insightful prophets in our country aren’t found outside the walls of the church.

I’m thinking voices like Leunig, or Clive Hamilton, or Hugh Mackay even. Tonight I discovered another prophet – Morris Glietzman – author of young adults novel Girl Underground. I haven’t read any of Glietzman’s other stuff, but this one took on the tough topic of mandatory detention for kids and really gave it a big knee in the soft bits.

Its a novel told in a very kid friendly style with a fair bit of Aussie humour and some likeable characters, but what really intrigued me was the subject matter itself. I guess it could be considered a bit weighty for young people – or maybe Glietzman ‘gets’ that kids can think and take action…

The story revolves around a central character Bridget who hails from a family of petty crims, but who gets sent to a posh private school to try and ‘give her a chance’. There she meets Menzies, son of a politician who has been corresponding with a family in detention (without his father’s knowledge or approval). The two get appalled at what is going on and hatch a plan to free the kids.

You can read the rest yourself… We read it as a family after dinner over the last week or so and the kids enjoyed it as well as being challenged by it.

Without wishing to spoil the story, the final chapter sees Bridget and Menzies face to face with their friends in the detention centre, locked up under guard and it isn’t easy reading. Danelle choked up as she read it and passed it to me. I did the same and passed it back… Because its a true story – a very real story – and a vile obscenity that has become normal in the ‘lucky country’.

Just last week my mate who is a chaplain in a Baptist school surveyed his Christian ed class and asked the question of his students ‘is it appropriate for our government to lock up children who come to this country by boat?’

The result?…

Twenty three out of the twenty four students in the class said ‘Yes – they should be locked up’

One said ‘no’.

Where did they learn to think like that? And is it indicative of where the rest of society is at?

Also this week Danelle drove one of our Iranian friends to the airport to pick up his wife and 3 year old daughter who he hadn’t seen for 18 months because he fled Iran under persecution and came to Australia by boat. She had finally got a visa and was able to come to Oz and join him. It was an emotional re-union as they saw each other again after much time apart.

They didn’t look like wannabe terrorists secretly scoping out the suburbs for a bomb plot. They looked like a mum and a dad who wanted to find life and hope and thought maybe Australia could be the place

When we left Ireland in 1974 I didn’t think of myself as a refugee – but in reality that’s what we were, fleeing a country divided by a war supposedly to do with religion and seeking a better life. In our part of the world there are now more South Africans per square kilometre than you would have ever thought possible – also refugees from a country in trouble.

But Irish and South Africans are both ‘white’ or caucasian in appearance whereas most of the refugees we don’t want have different coloured skin.

Surely that’s not it…

Is it?…

 

 

 

 

How to Vote in The Next Election

At the last federal election I voted for the Greens. I don’t think that makes me a ‘Green’. It does mean that I felt – on the whole – their position best depicted the stuff of the kingdom.

What disturbed me was the way some folks concluded that I obviously wasn’t a Christian because I held this point of view.

Next time we have an election and we need to decide how to vote I’ll be using some of the content from this book to help people think through their approach to such a complex question.

Its an easy read, but I recommend it to any pastors who know there isn’t a ‘Christian’ position and are looking to equip their people to make intelligent decisions. I thought that given it is American in origin it might be a bit lacking in relevance, but not at all.

I don’t know who I will vote for in the next election, but I do know what will be shaping my thinking on the issue – and it will be the same principles as last time. Perhaps if we can develop a framework for making decisions and appreciate that no choice is without its problems then we can avoid this nonsense of declaring people ‘out’ because they don’t tow the party line we have ignorantly decreed as ‘Christian’.

Mateship Tax… Really?

This morning as Julia Gillard announced her flood levy and called it a ‘mateship tax’ I couldn’t help thinking that was one of the most bizarre oxymorons I had heard in a long time. When do ‘mates’ legislate a ‘tax’ upon one another?

There’s no question it has been a devastating time for the people in the eastern states. It’s been difficult watching the flood reports, so I can only imagine how heart breaking it must be for those in the middle of it.

By contrast, it has been inspiring to see the way in which so many Australian people have either dug deep financially or have given physical assistance. Last night on the news I watched the story about the entire Swan Districts Football Club who had flown to Brisbane to lend a hand and spent their time shoveling mud out of a woman’s backyard, followed by a ‘good night’s sleep’ on mattresses in a community hall. It was a wonderful story of selfless giving.

Spontaneous generosity is a beautiful thing and offering genuine ‘no strings’ help to people in need is a sign that there is much goodness in this world. Jesus would say this is a sign of God’s future kingdom – of a coming day when there will be no pain, suffering or inequality – of a time when everyone has enough and when the whole world is restored to its original beauty – what the Bible calls the ‘new creation’.

Until that time comes we live in the original, now broken creation, where there will be trouble, when evil will sometimes prevail and when some will suffer because others are greedy. It’s not what God intends for his world but he invites us to be part of changing the landscape and inspiring a new way.

We can’t legislate generosity and love for one another, but we can encourage it, champion it and maybe even reward it in some way. The destruction in the East may require some kind of tax to help restore things back to normal. I think I can swallow that. But to link it to the word ‘mateship’ is likely going to sabotage much of the good that is being done by people simply from the generosity of their own hearts. How much healthier would our nation be if there was a prevailing attitude and desire to give rather than take and to think of others more than ourselves. If we got that right then we wouldn’t need a tax at all.

May your kingdom come on earth…

Is Islam the New Communism?

Remember the 60’s and 70’s when the ‘red peril’ was in full swing and the western world was worried about communist take overs?

Truthfully I don’t know how real any of it was – I guess it depends on whose propaganda you read. I have a sense it was more fear mongering and caricaturing than actual reality.

But lately I have been wondering if Islam is the new Communism. It certainly feels like it. As I watched a doco recently on the communist fear of the 60’s/70’s the language and sentiment reminded me a lot of the way we talk about Muslims today.

As I understand it Muslims are ‘evangelistic’ in that they want to spread Islam all across the world – not unlike Christians I guess… But like Christians I am fairly sure Muslims are a diverse bunch. To caricature Muslims as all of Al Quaeda ilk is akin to suggesting all Christians are aligned with the Ku Klux Klan. A little unfair for the vast majority…

I write this tentatively because I don’t speak with a lot of experience or knowledge, but I have grown familiar with the smell of fear – often irrational fear and that is what I sense in the air around Oz at the moment.

So the Commies are no longer a threat, but now the Muslims are coming to get us…

Really?…

I realise this is a hot topic and a provocative one and I am happy to hear some useful input from people (genuinely) in the know. If you simply want to rant your uninformed prejudice then save it for someone who cares.I am neither a fan of Communism or Islam, but I am interested to think thru whether we are reacting from facts or fear.

Fired Up

I haven’t commented on the bushfire tragedy here in Oz this week.

Its hard to know what to write without sounding either trite or glib. It has been a shocking and devastating week for many people.

What it has shown very clearly however are the two sides of human nature.

How totally braindead dipsticks can go around lighting more fires while people die and others risk their lives fighting them is beyond me. Surely this is the dark side of humanity – the human race at its worst – ‘sin’ at its most brazen. I don’t know anyone who is anything but appalled at this tragedy and would want to see the arsonists suffer great punishment.

By contrast there is the amazing spirit of support and co-operation from all over Australia to give help to those who have suffered – a beautiful picture of humanity at its best – loving and caring for one another simply because there is need. The generosity has been great to see.

Its a reminder that we are sinful people capable of incredible depravity and yet at the same time created in the image of God and equally capable of acts of kindness and goodness.

of course out in left field (or more correctly ‘far right’ field) there is the Christian leader who wants to see the bushfires as the judgement of God on Victoria for passing the pro-abortion bill… I could write so much more… and I would like to… but I think it best if I simply let you know that he and I do not agree on that one.

Shark Alerts and World Financial Crises

Is there really a world financial crisis?…

I went to the beach today and for the first time in my life I was a little worried about sharks. The reason I was feeling like this was the huge number of recent stories in the Perth news about shark sightings. Its as if there are more sharks lurking in our beaches than ever! And yet reality is that there have always been sharks and there are probably fewer now than ever before because we are better at killing them.

But the more we are told that something is true the more likely we are to believe it.

Which makes me wonder if the world is really in such a bad state… or… if we have heard some news reports and the result has been a self fulfilling prophecy.

We hear that things are bad so we sell our shares and as we sell our shares things get bad, so we sell more shares. So the media reports on the growing crisis and we get alarmed… and so it goes on.

Were things really that bad 6 months ago?

Or has media reporting actually created the crisis?

Whatever the case I am off to Lancelin tomorrow to go surfing and I know there is 50 000 x more chance of me getting killed on the road on the way there than getting eaten by a shark!

bud abbott and lou costello meet frankenstein divx online

Approximations of Justice

“He who would seek revenge should dig a grave for two.” Jewish proverb

This week I wrote a letter to the editor of the West Australian newspaper disagreeing with the opinions of another Christian.

His letter basically stated that the death penalty was the only appropriate punishment for the Bali bombers and that this would be ‘God’s justice’ meted out to them. He quoted the OT and was pretty vitriolic in his comments towards a previous letter writer who had suggested death was not the only option.

I was reading the paper while sipping a long mach in Cranked Cafe and couldn’t help but respond. It was a ‘gut’ response rather than a much thought thru and deliberated upon letter.

My letter reads:

The same book Don Jackson cites to advocate the death penalty for Bali bombers also says ‘do not return evil with evil but overcome evil with good’. Which one is it? Which one will build a better world? Justice must be done – no question – but you have limited it to one response and called it ‘God’s justice’ when it actually sounds a lot more like ‘Don’s justice’.

I find the question of what to do with the Bali bombers a hugely vexed one with no easy solutions. I think the death penalty is

a neat and tidy, ‘easy’ solution. It removes them from the planet and they can kill no more…

However this action gives birth to many consequences. To kill these men is simply to return evil for evil – which in turn will get responded to by more evil and so on. Someone has to break the cycle. It may also serve to make them martyrs and heros – probably not the desire result either. But it won’t act to dissuade people from killing. And even if it did I would question whether it is an appropriate response.

In talking with Mike & Rachel the other night (when I dropped in for dinner and had an amazing prawn salad) Mike mentioned that all of our attempts at justice are only approximations. We are not God and can never get things perfectly right. While in this case there may be a clear situation of wrongdoing we are still approximating a response.

To be quite honest there is a part of me that thinks they should die and even more, they deserve to die, yet I find it hard to hold that position biblically. I don’t expect a secular world to hold any regard for the biblical story, and I recognise that we as Christians will even disagree on best responses at times.

The reason for my letter was not because I am an ardent ‘anti-capital punishment’ supporter (although I would definitely err on that side of things) but it was because sharp, black and white often simplistic responses based on Old Testament passages of scripture leave me cold and infuriated.

Life is rarely as simple as I hear it made out to be.download red letters free

enemy of the state dvdrip download