I was sitting in church last night, listening to one of the same passages of scripture being read that I have heard time and time again over the last 60 years:
28 When[aj] Jesus finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed by his teaching, 29 because he taught them like one who had authority,[ak] not like their experts in the law.
Matt 7:28-29
When I think of Jesus speaking with authority I imagine him speaking forcefully, with presence and gravitas – making sure people heard and understood his message. I’ve pretty much seen it that way for as long as I can remember.
Then last night it just struck me that the comparison Matthew makes is with the ‘experts in the law’, the same people Jesus also refers to as hypocrites because they don’t practice what they preach. It made me wonder if the point Matthew is making actually has less to do with Jesus’ oratory capacities and more to do with the integrity of his life. Perhaps Jesus was able to speak with authority because there was congruence between his life and his words so when people heard him speak they had already observed him as the real deal.
Of course that may have given impetus to his voice, but I sense authority comes from a congruent life, rather than from knowing how to use appropriate voice modulation techniques.
Nick Cave’s song Into My Arms, opens with the line, ‘I don’t believe in an interventionist God’. He goes on to reflect further on what he may allow to be or not be. He wrote that song in 1997 and subsequently suffered the pain of having two of his sons die. A recent interview on the ABC and his book Faith Hope and Carnage portray him as a man with genuine gritty faith, but in this song conclusion is crystal clear – God has left us to figure things out on our own.
I do believe in an interventionist God – but I don’t believe he is predictably interventionist. And that is where frustration and confusion often lies.
If ever there was a conundrum it is the question of how God works (or doesn’t work) in this world. Sometimes we hear things attributed to ‘the hand of God’ that can sound amazing or absurd. Sometimes we hear God blamed for things that may or not have been his fault. How can we ever know what is going on?
These reflections come on the back of watching this week’s ABC Foreign Correspondent, the story of Dr Ken Elliot and his wife who were taken as hostages in Burkina Faso, with her being released after 2 weeks and him after over 7 years. It’s an amazing story of faith and faithfulness – both theirs and Gods – at least that’s how it appears to me (and to them). They attribute Ken’s eventual release to prayer and God’s faithfulness. They also believe God knew all of this was going to happen and somehow it was part of his plan. Hmmmm… You can’t watch the story and not be inspired by the Elliot’s story – spending 40 years in one of the poorest of countries living out their faith in practical and clear ways – yet their time in Africa ended with an abduction and some very difficult years. Neither of them appeared at all bitter or angry for the experience even though there were many difficult years. They would say ‘God had it all in control.’
Really? Was God in control of all those events? Was God manipulating people and actions to bring about their kidnapping and release for some great reason we are unable to see?
We speak like this often, believing that God is somehow at work in the world, behind the scenes working things out oblivious to our desires and actions – like he has a plan and we only appear to be free agents within that plan. We also speak of listening and discerning God’s next step for us, assuming he will choose to guide and direct. Or sometimes we look back in hindsight and believe we see the hand of God at work in circumstances and events. I imagine it’s more accurate to say that we interpret events this way – and while I do believe God is at work I’m not sure we can always interpret those events as such with any accuracy.
If we believe in a world where evil forces are at work as well as good, then perhaps we could just as credibly say that it was those forces that led to the Elliot’s kidnapping?… For whatever reason evil prevailed for a time and good people suffered as a result.
Was it ‘God’s will’ for evil to prevail for a time, for them to be abducted and separated for so long? Was this all part of a greater plan? Honestly… we don’t know. We really can’t say anything conclusively, but we do all have a leaning in these times. Some of us see God as faithful despite the evil that was at work to abduct them, others see God at work in the abduction to bring about some greater good.
To hear the story tonight was to listen to two faithful, godly people speak with grace and kindness and not a hint of antagonism. Perhaps if you work in a place like Burkina Faso you have already accepted the risk of such things happening. Maybe you can’t go live in a notoriously dangerous place and cry foul if you happen to be on the receiving end of some ill treatment? I think that’s a fair statement. All work of that kind has a risk. Their stance was perhaps like that of the 3 blokes tossed in the fire in the book of Daniel 3:17-18
If the God whom we serve exists, then He is able to deliver us from the blazing fiery furnace and from your hand, O king. But even if He does not, let it be known to you, O king, that we will not serve your gods or worship the golden statue you have set up.”
Daniel 3:17-18
Surely you have read that at times and thought ‘what kind of faith is that?’ He is able to save us – but maybe he won’t… I’d suggest it’s a very realistic faith – an approach to God that acknowledges his capacity, but also our own inability to predict what his actions may be in any given circumstance.
I’d defy anyone to state with 100% clarity what God was up to with the lives of the Elliots in Africa over the last 8 years. Some would say that their faithfulness gives added ‘boot’ to their many years of ministry and may have repercussions down the line they may never live to see. Some would say it was cruel that God allowed this kidnapping to happen and that he really let them down after so many years of faithful service.
Their story has a somewhat happy ending. They get to spend their final years together in peace, back in the security of Perth, although I’d be half inclined to guess that Ken is secretly making plans to return if given the chance 🙂 He just seems like that kind of bloke.
While their story had a happy ending – one where we could say God was faithful and good, if we consider the plight of another significant and dedicated Christian then things didn’t end so well. 20th C theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer was part of the resistance to the Nazi government, and despite his overt pacifism, he eventually got involved in a plan to assassinate Hitler. Unfortunately for him the plan came unstuck and he finished up in jail. At this time he was engaged – in love – and he wrote letters to his fiance from jail, but Bonhoeffer did not get released. In fact he was executed just a few days before his prison camp was liberated by the American forces. At the age of 39 his life was cut short.
It begs the question – where was God in this situation?
Was this a divine stuff up – a real case of God getting it very wrong or was this all part of a greater plan? Why wouldn’t a good God come thru earlier for a man with such dedication and capacity? And his fiance?… How did she process his execution? It wasn’t fair… but God didn’t stop it happening…
Bonhoeffer died as he lived with the final words, “This is for me the end, the beginning of life.”
There is no sense in Bonhoeffer’s writings that he felt duped by God with his imprisonment, or that his death was all part of a sovereign plan. I get the sense Bonhoeffer knew the broken nature of our world and accepted that. He also knew the risks of getting involved in the assassination plot so he wore the consequences.
These are two ‘public events’ that we can reflect on, but all of us have things happen in our lives at times that we may refer to as a) the hand of God b) good fortune. Can we ever know which is which? I sense we can to some degree, but never conclusively. When I hear people speaking of their whole life as having been orchestrated by divine acts I am somewhat skeptical. Equally when people of faith refuse to consider any involvement or interaction of God in their worlds I wonder ‘why bother with a God who never gets involved?’
But we have to be careful with how we approach this whole subject.
The person who runs late for a plane that crashes and fails to board may be giving thanks to God for his preservation of their life, but the families of the 10 Christian people on board the plane who died in the crash are less likely to be thanking God for the outcome. Where was God at work in that scenario – if at all?
You get the problem? The complexity?
It seems that sooner or later we have to be content to live with mystery and to accept that we simply do not know why things do or don’t happen. Hard theological lines that see God as orchestrating every event are impossible to accept – God inevitably becomes a monster – the author of famine, flood, one punch deaths… and so on.
To believe in a non interventionist God is also equally unsatisfying. Why bother praying if he has already checked out? And how can you ever have a relationship with a God like that?
God’s action or inaction in the world has been a significant issue for our family over the last 5 months as we have processed Sam’s death. Was Sam’s death all part of a divine plan – ‘God’s will’ as we call it? I wouldn’t subscribe to that
Did God see this happening and fail to intervene? Well yeah… if we accept that God is ever present and all powerful then he did not act to save our son’s life. Much as he didn’t intervene to delay Bonhoeffer’s death by a few days he didn’t miraculously give Sam extra air in his lungs to make it to the surface.
Or perhaps God is like Cave describes him – ‘non-interventionist’. He saw, he watched, he knew, but he keeps his hands off as he always does?
Every scenario presents a wrestle, or a choice to live with mystery.
My core conviction has been that God is good – and he is perfectly represented in Jesus. And I start from there with all of my theological musings. If i take that foundation stone away I can become all kinds of cynical, but while it is there I am able to trust when I cannot see and when all of my emotions are wanting to blame and accuse.
So – I tire of some of our Christianese that avoids the complexity and mystery of our world and I hope for more wrestling with our tendency to try and apply a black or white filter to any situation that appears to be grey. The Elliot’s story, Bonhoeffer and our own recent events all require some nuanced and careful reflection rather than glib statements that often leave us feeling unsatisfied and with more questions than answers.
In other news I (we – to a small degree) have been pondering the possibility of having a dog in the home again and last week I wrote a list to try and help with the decision.
Someone once said we are rational beings who occasionally make emotive decisions – but I tend to think there is plenty of evidence to suggest we are emotionally driven creatures who occasionally use our brains.
Back in 2011 when we moved to Yanchep, we made it a practice to always come home by the beach road. It’s a little longer, but then why live in a beautiful place if you don’t indulge in that beauty often. Then in 2017 I made it a practice to take a daily photo / video of one of our local beaches and uploaded to Instagram and Facebook. So this road has been a significant and beautiful part of my daily life. It was part of the reason we chose to have Sam’s memorial here, but also because there was no place he loved like Yanchep. He’d be stoked to know that he stopped traffic for half an hour or so while we made the walk to the surf club!
We are incredibly blessed to live in this place and enjoy all its richness, but it’s been curious to observe a different shade on the daily ritual, so that is what this poem is expressing. (Without that little piece of back story it may seem a little odd).
Every day
I drive the same familiar road
As it wends gently around our local beach
Every day
Without fail
It is a rich liturgy
A regular practice of worship
Recognising the creator and his goodness
Daily giving thanks for the place we call home
—
Then one day…
—
That familiar road changed forever
The drive became both beautiful and riven
Seablue on sorrow
Gratitude shaded by tears
These two must somehow hang together now
The beauty is no less beautiful
Because of the sorrow
The pain is no less anguished
Because of the wonder
—
On that day
Hundreds of mourners flooded the road
A young man had died too soon
Some knew him well
Some from afar
But all knew
It was a moment we should not have been sharing.
A terrible lapse of judgement
An unfixable mistake
A permanent agonising hole in our hearts
—
Somehow the ocean we love
The ocean that has enriched our lives so wonderfully
Claimed the person we loved
Our son, brother, partner, friend
Took his last breath
In those great blue depths
—
In the slow silent trek to the surf club
We cried out in grief, rage and terror
Powerless to change this new reality.
This precious place
Now lives in my heart
As the home of immense joy and peace
But also death and loss
Trauma and pain
On that day we walked the road slowly
Trailing a shiny black car
Mourners held ground
As traffic was redirected
A final walk to remember him
—
Now
Every day
I drive that road
Still
Every day
I see the foaming ocean
The fringing reef
And I give thanks
Every day
I remember my boy
Who I taught to love this ocean
To seek adventure in her waves
And to live…
Every day
Gratitude dovetaiils with grief
Predictable as the tide
For better or worse
Every day
My soul rises and falls on this road
—
Yes, I could take another route
Weave through the quiet streets to flee the searing reminder
On Monday I attended my brother’s funeral and listened to the tributes people shared of who he was and what he meant to them. As I listened it began to dawn on me that they knew a different person to the one I had ‘known’ all my life. People spoke of a kind, gentle and generous man who loved his wife and family deeply. They spoke of his love for music, wine, food and travel – for shoes and watches – colourful clothes and for his dog and cat.
It felt like they were describing a very good man, but it wasn’t a man that I knew.
As I was cycling today I was reflecting on our relationship of 57 years and why it was awkward and clumsy. Part of it was upbringing – a culture lacking in emotional connection – and part of it was that I mistook his softness and sensitivity for weakness and neediness. As a result I stepped away from him to hang with more blokey blokes. That happened some time in our 20’s and from then on our connection was difficult. So this poem is part memoir and part lament.
The closest I have come to drowning was a day when we were surfing the south side of Margaret River. It was 4-6ft, onshore and messy, then out of the blue came this sneaker set that must have been 8ft and caught us all inside. It took me down several times and I lost my bearings for a while, until I finished up just washing across the reef and eventually catching my breath and limping in. This week Phil suggested to me that grief is like copping a sneaker set on the head. So this poem kinda taps into that experience.
Grief is a 3 wave hold down.
You can never know for sure
When the demon
Will strike
So you relax, laugh, chat
Let your guard slip
But then…
The moment…
The entire horizon seems to rise
And obscure the sky
You realise
It is NOW
And there is nothing you can do
—
Winding in from the deep
The first monster unleashes its fury
You were not ready
So desperate paddles simply draw you
Closer into its jaws
Where you are devoured
Pummelled mercilessly
Death-rolled by vice like jaws
You flounder breathlessly
Stunned at the ferocity of its impact
Raw adrenalin pushes you to surface
To draw a single gasping breath
—
Only to see a second towering wall of water
Detonate in front of you
Rag-dolling your already jelly limbs
Plunging you once more to the depths
Where it shakes you in its teeth like an angry dog
One of the things I have long despised about the American basketball scene is the way a team is so often defined by a single player.
Think LA Lakers and Le Bron James comes to mind, think Dallas Mavericks and Luka Donkic is the person most likely to personify the team. Games are often advertised as a contest between two superstars rather than as a team contest
To be fair basketball is a sport where one star player can make a significant difference and Luka has often been a picture of that.
But it seems to speak of a posture that is more about the talent and performance of the individual, rather than about the combined effort of the team.
In recent days the Australian Boomers Olympic squad was selected and there were a couple of notable omissions – the most significant being the absence of Matisse Thybulle. It seems Brian Goorjian has been seeking to get the right ‘blend’ of talent, rather choosing talent and then looking for a way to draw the team together. Thybulle was an unfortunate casualty of this approach, so it will be interesting to see if the Goorjian method actually bears fruit.
While I will miss watching the defensive moves of Thybulle, I will say that I admire Goorjian’s courage in seeking to build a star team rather than a team of stars. So far the warm up games seem to have proved his philosophy a winner, but the acid test will be the 3 group games where there simply are no ‘gimmes’. Spain, Greece and Canada will all be very hard games and it will take everything we have got just to make it out of the group, let alone enter medal contention.
It seems Patty Mills has found his shooting touch again which is awesome, Giddey appears very competent in running the point and Jock Landale can hold his own in the centre. With Dyson Daniels, Josh Green and Dante Exum in the squad there is also plenty of depth. So far Duop Reath has seen very little court time, but he’s another who can play a number of positions and be a real threat from both inside and outside
I get the sense that Joe Ingles and Matt Delly may be there for their court leadership and team spirit as much as their actual capacity – not that either are poor players – they are probably just at their last Olympics.
So will we do it? Will we get thru the group – to the quarters – to the semi’s – to a gold medal game?…
I hate to get my hopes up – but I think it’s possible if ‘luck’ runs our way. I reckon it all hangs on getting a good start against Spain – drop that game and it’s all uphill from there…
The other evening as I was chatting with my friend Stu he asked ‘so what’s next for you? Where do you sense God taking you?’
I usually have a pretty clear answer for questions of that kind as I tend to look to the future and see it well. That evening I also had a clear answer – but not one I anticipated. There were two aspects to it:
a) Before Sam died Danelle was excited about studying Clinical Pastoral Education with a view to becoming a hospital chaplain and he died exactly one week before she was to begin her course. So it has been shelved until such time as she is able to pick it up again.
As Danelle and I had conversations around this I sensed that it was time for me to support her in the things she loves and is gifted at. This is her sweet spot – taking people from ‘pain to peace’ is how she describes her calling. So that is part one – wait for her to get to a place where she feels ready to study and then support her in this and whatever roles may come from it. Most of our life she has come alongside whatever I had felt called to and supported. It’s time for her to shine a little more.
b) Stay – I have read a lot about the grief process over the last 4 months and one of the poems that has stayed with me is titled ‘Stay’ from the book Sparrow by Jan Richardson. It’s message is essentially don’t rush past this time – don’t look to ‘move on quickly’ and thereby miss what you may see and gain by staying in it.
It’s a little bit of an odd idea – who ever wants to sit in pain and loss? But her point is strong – wait – stay – and see what comes from that practice. While technically it’s a ‘blessing for ascension day’, it is also a call to those of us who are oriented towards moving quickly thru life to pause and wait. So that will be the second part of my focus – quite simply to ‘stay’ in the space and to see what comes from being here.
I don’t see that as an inactive / passive posture, but more one of learning and listening to what the Spirit may want to say or do and in that space to continue with ‘life as normal’, running our business, speaking occasionally as needed and living in the local community.
So that’s ‘the plan’ – not sure how well I will do at it, but I am happy to give it a shot.
And the poem is below with a brief comment from Richardson:
I wrote this for Ascension Sunday some years ago—in the spring before Gary died, as it turned out. It reminds me how blessings have a way of moving both within and beyond time, spiralling around to meet us anew in the ways we most need but never expected. In these unexpected days, this blessing is for you.
“Stay,” by Jan Richardson
I know how your mind rushes ahead trying to fathom what could follow this. What will you do, where will you go, how will you live?
You will want to outrun the grief. You will want to keep turning toward the horizon, watching for what was lost to come back, to return to you and never leave again.
For now hear me when I say all you need to do is to still yourself is to turn toward one another is to stay.
Wait and see what comes to fill the gaping hole in your chest. Wait with your hands open to receive what could never come except to what is empty and hollow.
You cannot know it now, cannot even imagine what lies ahead, but I tell you the day is coming when breath will fill your lungs as it never has before and with your own ears you will hear words coming to you new and startling. You will dream dreams and you will see the world ablaze with blessing.
I don’t often answer the phone at 8am on a Saturday morning, but it was my brother showing on the caller ID so I figured I’d pick up… However, when I answered, the voice was female – his daughter calling on his phone to let me know he had a cardiac arrest shortly before and was now in an ambulance on the way to hospital. I remembered a few months back when I had last heard this type of voice tone – it didn’t end well. We quickly gathered ourselves and drove down to the Joondalup hospital to see him and the family.
Despite all the best efforts of his wife and the medics, he never regained consciousness. The initial minutes he spent without oxygen destroyed his brain and while the machines kept him breathing for a few days longer he never ‘came back’. At just 57 his life ended… That’s terribly sad and he leaves behind a wife and family who loved him deeply.
So it’s been a rough few months for the Hamilton families. With Steve’s death there is an added weight of grief now to deal with. It is now a ‘muddled grief’ – because the pain of Sam still has us reeling and somehow we now factor in Steve. I don’t really know how you do that – but I guess we are about to find out.
———-
I realised recently that leaving Nth Ireland at 10 years old and coming to Australia with just the 4 of us, I didn’t have the same experiences of ‘family’ as other people did. We had a fairly large extended family in Nth Ireland, and I imagine had we lived there I may have connected with them and they may have been my ‘go to’ for friendship. But over here it was us – just us – the 4 of us and we weren’t a highly connected or emotionally engaged family.
As I reflect on my teen years I remember unconsciously ‘adopting’ friends and older mentors as surrogate family. In our home we rarely engaged in matters of the heart and if we ever did the conversations were usually awkward and clumsy, so we tended to back out quickly into safer territory. As a result the people who helped me address life’s big questions and challenging personal situations came from elsewhere, mostly from within the church community. This was the path I chose from teen years onwards and while the biblical description of church as ‘family’ became very real for me, the experience at home – and with Steve – was more perfunctory.
I have very few memories of the time Steve and I shared as brothers in Nth Ireland – strange – but maybe indicative of how we interacted generally. We did things together – we even shared a double bed for the first 10 years of my life (it was an Irish thing I think…) but we just didn’t experience the kind of intimate connections I have observed in other people’s families. When I think of some of the subjects Sam and I used to discuss I occasionally laugh out loud. I could never talk about that stuff with my dad! As I wonder why this was so difficult in my early years. I’m sure part of it was culture – it just wasn’t the done thing in that era – especially in what I would describe as ‘fundamentalist Baptist’ culture. But a significant part of it was also the relational and emotional coolness that seemed to be so much a part of our family life. We shared a home, but not our hearts.
In our teens Steve and I hung out quite a bit, played basketball together and went on surfing trips and hung out in youth groups, churches and the like. Steve loved the surfing and skating and even shaped a couple of his own boards.
Steve with 2 of the boards he shaped.
In that time I found myself constantly trying to ‘escape’ the home while he was constantly seeking to experience a warmer more engaged familial connection. He wanted, needed and was capable of deeper relationship, but I was finding that type of friendship in other places so I fobbed him off. As the years went on I disappointed him a lot with my lack of energy for our relationship – and his ongoing need to connect only seemed to push me further away. It was strained and confused for most of our adult life and while I slowly learnt what it meant to be a family as I hung with Danelle’s crew, it also served to remind me what a fuzzle my own experience had been. (Yeah I just made up a word there – ‘fuzzle’.)
So Steve and I weren’t very close – even if we were supposed to be. Neither were we estranged. We were just two men with very different life trajectories who happened to be brothers. I imagine this is the case for many sibllings.
What I do recall clearly is that as boys growing up, Steve was the kind, sensitive and generous one. I vividly remember a day when we both had been given bags of lollies. Even though I already had my own bag, Steve asked if I wanted some of his – a very kind and genuine gesture – and I accepted, but with absolutely no intention to reciprocate. In those early years Steve was the kind of person you would hope your kids would turn out to be. Me, not so much…
As well as as being kind and gentle Steve was also very slightly built and emotionally sensitive. He became a target for bullies at school who knew they could get a rise out of him with virtually no consequences. This bullying wounded him and it continued throughout his life in various places. We didn’t know it at the time, but Steve had a condition called Kleinfeldters Syndrome, (meaning he had an extra ‘x’ chromosome) and as a result had fewer male characteristics and did not develop during puberty as other boys did.
As well as having an impact on his physical appearance the condition directly impacted his academic capacity. Steve struggled at school, and left before year 11-12 to pick up a job as a store man for a medical company. Steve loved life and he travelled around the world, bought an old HJ Holden which became his daily driver for a while and also a green mini – which we found one morning on blocks on the front lawn as someone had stolen his wheels.
It was only when he and his first wife attempted to have children that his condition was discovered. Generally speaking men with Kleinfeldters have little to no sperm so he was unable to have children of his own. Shortly after this discovery his wife left and he was single again, but this time with the knowledge of his condition.
I can only imagine how devastating that time was for him. We caught up a little, but I was generally too ambitious and busy to find time for him and people he thought were his own close friends didn’t connect with him as he hoped either. His church didn’t give him the support he was seeking so he made the choice to step away from faith and his church community to find another way to frame his life.
Steve at The Farm
Steve wanted and expected genuine connection with people and he sought to give this himself, but few were able to be what he needed. Each time he expressed his disappointment with me I would step further away, only ever exacerbating the problem. As a soft-hearted, gentle person he took a bruising in that time and as a result he hardened up.
Steve developed coping mechanisms for the relational disappointment he experienced. Over time he became more angular and quick to bite. Whereas previously he had absorbed whatever hostility had come his way, now he was snapping back. It didn’t sit well on him and I wondered what the young Steve would have been like as an adult if he hadn’t copped the knocks. I imagine he would have been a very well formed man – probably someone I would have enjoyed being around.
Steve went back to study as a mature aged student and achieved a degree in Men’s health, a decent effort for a bloke with his academic limitations. However he was unable to find a job in the field so eventually went back to store work and this was his mainstay ever since. His love for wine saw him complete sommelier courses and he worked a second job offering wine tastings in liquor stores. Steve loved his wine and food.
He was committed to looking after his wife and his inherited family and he was doing the best he could. He was a good bloke.
Life didn’t deal Steve a great hand and he had his fair share of struggle. The last few years have been more peaceful between us as we have both settled into the knowledge that we will be connected by family, but its unlikely we will hang out as close friends.
As I reflect back on our 57 years of relationship I do regret that I wasn’t better able to connect with him as he needed. As an alpha male type I tended to seek out and hang with the other A types and that description never fitted Steve. Sadly the immaturity of those early years set a pattern from which we never recovered, despite Steve’s efforts to the contrary.
When Steve died he was probably about as content as I have seen him over the whole course of his life. He was with a woman he loved deeply and who loved him, he inherited a family who he gladly embraced as his own and he had settled into a job that he enjoyed.
When I look at Danelle’s family I see a depth of connection that is quite foreign to me. It took me a long time to engage well with them because I just hadn’t ever seen family in that way. I feel like I have learnt how to be a decent human being largely from the love and consistent teaching of my wife. Over the years my own abrasive edges and sharp tongue have mellowed as she has taught me better ways to relate. I really wasn’t very good at ‘being human’ for a long time.
The last time I saw Steve was for lunch at a local cafe. He wanted to catch up with Danelle and I after Sam’s death, to check in and see how we were going. We chatted for an hour or so, but nothing about Sam. I wondered if he was just going to pass over this monstrous elephant or if maybe we should raise it. Then red faced and a bit awkward, he asked how we were doing since Sam’s death. I realised he probably wanted to ask this all the time we were there, but it just wasn’t a part of the way we normally engaged. Our ‘rules of engagement’ didn’t generally include heart conversations, but I was so glad he pushed thru. What followed was a genuine and caring conversation as we shared our pain and he quietly listened. It was a good final memory.
Steve surfing Smith’s Beach on his own…
As with Sam, it’s hard to imagine that he will never be around again – that my only sibling in the world has died and that any possibility of a more significant relationship has ended. There’s a genuine sadness there that I feel now as an older, ‘second half of life’ man that wasn’t there in my younger self absorbed days.
Steve’s was a genuinely good guy, who struggled bravely through life and who brought a lot of love to his own family and he will be missed by all of us.
(Photo credit to Ben Chipper – an old mate of Steve’s)
I’m an introvert by nature so most of my processing is done internally before it ever sees the light of day. When I cycle, surf or go to the gym I am very conscious that my mind is partially on what I am doing, but there is another ‘script’ running in the background – and it’s using up a lot of resource. I’m less reserved around close friends. I freely speak whatever is going on, but I rarely unload a ‘full dump’ – not that I don’t want to, or don’t feel permission – I just never seem to have the kind of language on hand to actually give depth of voice to what I am feeling in a particular moment.
This is where poetry has been valuable – I can write a poem in an hour sometimes as words and phrases tumble conveniently into one another – while other times it can be weeks ruminating on some particular aspect of the death / grief experience. I know there is something I want to communicate but it is ‘stuck’ – so I drop it for a while, then late on a Thursday night just before going to bed words and phrases seem to appear in my mind – the tone of what I am feeling deep in my being – words materialise that I had never thought of previously. Perfect potent words that turn a left jab into a crashing left hook.
Death and grief is completely new terrain for me in so many ways. I really haven’t had too much life suffering to deal with, so my tool bag is a bit more loaded on exploring the ‘joys of life’ side – finding purpose, meaning, friendship, love – all the ‘goodies’. I have learnt how to ‘suck the marrow out of life’ to quote ‘Mr Keating’. And that is what I have been good at helping people do. Right now I’m about as far from land as I can imagine and in a very small boat. But I feel like if I’m here then it’s time to learn how to sail. I didn’t intend to be here, no one ever does.
Two things I feel very deeply are
a) This terrible experience is not going to take me / us down. I am not going back to the grog or over-eating, nor am I gonna drop the ball on purpose and vocation. I’m fine with a gentler pace of life – with a large space in which to do whatever gets done when people grieve – but I’m also conscious that the vices of laziness and self indulgence/sensuality will take this opportunity to tap me on the shoulder and let me know they have a better plan…
b) While I couldn’t subscribe to the idea that God manufactured this situation as part of a greater plan, I do believe we can bring good out of life’s excrement. Romans 8:28 says ‘God is able to work all things together for good’ if we follow him and trust his purposes (which is very very different to God ‘orchestrating’ all things for good). I’m up for that- if anyone knows how to bring good from the death of a much loved son then God would be the one with a few ideas. I’m hoping I will learn how to do that.
What does that mean day to day?
I feel like it means allowing people into my life in a significant way as we move thru this rather than when the dust has settled. I have really valued the number of male friends who have sought me out and given me the space to talk and ponder. If nothing else I have been just a bit overwhelmed by the sense of being loved by those around me. That is a beautiful thing.
I like to learn a couple of new things each year – so maybe this year will be around ‘how to live with grief in a healthy way and to learn who I am and how I respond in these places’. It’s not my happy place, but I can’t do much about that. I am here, so I want to figure out how to live with loss in such a way that I become a ‘richer’ more complete person. I’ve read a stack of books on grief – to the point where I have now had enough of the subject itself. I get it – there is no map – it sucks…
I want to keep in touch with those who have been affected by Sam’s life and death – whatever shape that takes. I know there are a number of people really struggling with his death as much as I am at times. They are one of our connections to him and we are a significant connection point for them.
I realise much of that is quite individualistic, but I also know that I simply can’t map a plan for Danelle or Ellie or Cosi. We can support one another, but there is definitely an element of walking alone in this experience. To lose a brother, a lover, a son is all very very different and we each walk a unique path.
What I have observed the last couple of times I have spoken in churches is that 3 people have come up to me after the service to let me know that they also lost sons in their early 20’s. I am realising that the death of a child is perhaps more common than I had ever known. There’s something about looking in the eyes of someone who has been there. After speaking in a small country church a few weeks back, a woman approached me said ‘I know how you feel,’ and i could see from her eyes that she did. She went on to tell me of her son’s death and her journey with grief as she gone thru life.
Makes me wonder how much pain is there in the world that I have simply no idea about?
