Are your systems perfectly designed to give you the results you are now getting?

Tuesday morning is Danelle’s and my day for catching up, chatting and praying together. Today as we spoke about what we are doing in Brighton I mentioned to Danelle that old statement ‘your systems are perfectly designed to give you the results you are now getting’, as a way of explaining where we are at. Its a quote I often find helpful when it comes to analysing organisational performance.

Danelle’s response: ‘Bullshit!’

So you disagree honey?

‘Absolutely! Absolute bullshit! Where God is involved then that statement is not true at all.’

Danelle believes that when we are discussing issues that involve God’s presence and ability participate then the whole concept makes no sense…

What do you think?…

Get ready for feisty comment from my wife…

Evangelism & Empowering Peacemakers

Jarrod McKenna Empowering PeacemakersEmpowering Peacemakers

 

Guest in the backyard: Jarrod McKenna

Can we separate living the gospel from sharing it? Evangelism from the invitation to follow Jesus?

Last night I arrived back from a country tour with ‘Empowering Peacemakers’ (or EPYC) inviting High School students to forsake lives wasteful consumption and dare lose their themselves in lives of compassion on behalf of Jesus’ message for the poor and the earth.

I’m always amazed (!) at the responses.

Yesterday I was ambushed by students wanting to give me hugs (a bit awkward), ask for Bible’s (not something we offer just something they wanted after exploring Scripture in the workshop!!), committed themselves to the FACE UP TO POVERTY campaign and gave up their lunch time to talk about Jesus, their lives, their concerns about the world and the gospel.

-What’s EPYC’s secret that has kids that aren’t Christians queuing up to talk about Jesus after workshops?

-Why is it that young people run up wanting to give hugs and share their stories?

-Why is it that students (who aren’t Christians) ask for copies of the Bible and want to start social justice groups in their schools when many youth pastors have talked to me about difficulties in getting their church youth groups into the Scriptures and moving their focus off themselves!?

-And how is it that EPYC gets asked back into public state schools?

worshopping God's revolution

Some thoughts:

1. The Means is the Message

EPYC believes only way to share ‘Jesus is the Way’ is to do it in ‘the Way of Jesus’. The Early Christians where known as ‘people of the Way’ because they were filled with the Spirit to obey everything Jesus commanded (Matt. 28:19-20). Their is no point teaching the texture of the kingdom (nonviolence) if you are going to go about it in forceful ways (the ways of the fallen world).

2. The Medium is the Message

EPYC is committed to embodiment. Young people can feel when people really are living an alternative or if they are just talking a good game. ‘Bait and switch’ has nothing on ’embody and let them ask’ (read 1 Peter 4:15 in the context of verse 8-14 teaching on nonviolence). In sharing personal stories of the empowerment of God’s grace to live as signs of what God has done in Jesus and giving power over to young people to ask questions in the setting of their and our worlds biggest problems

3. The Message is the Message

EPYC believes the gospel is just that… good news! 🙂 EPYC actively resists watering down the gospel, tickling ears, shying away from the demands of discipleship, bending the knee to Principalities and Powers who avoid preaching Christ crucified. In EPYC workshops we trust Scripture has a power beyond our cheap four step summations of the Bible. EPYC don’t hide students from the Bible but openly explores solid exegesis of Biblical texts with students that aren’t Christian trusting that God’s Spirit is at work drawing us to all truth and that Jesus really is good news for all that our world is going through.

4. “History belongs to the Intercessors” (sorry it didn’t start with ‘M’)

EPYC believes, as Walter Wink puts it, “History Belongs to the Intercessors”. We can do solid exegesis and prepare a good workshop but if it hasn’t been covered in solid prayer it isn’t going to have the effects it could have and I’m not going to be in a space where I’m sensitive to what the Spirit is doing.

As Scott McKnight put about EPYC on his blog he resonates deeply with “evangelism programs that invite people to experiment with the way of Christ as a way of coming to Christ.”

After all can we separate living the gospel from sharing it? Evangelism from the invitation to follow Jesus?

Thanks to all those who continue to hold EPYC in prayer.

“go ye” and Gandhi

Gandhi greeting a little one

 

 Jarrod McKenna‘s Wednesday’s with Gandhi: “May it not be that ‘Go ye unto all the world’ message has been somewhat narrowly interpreted and the spirit of it missed? It will not be denied, I speak from experience, that many of the conversions are only so-called. In some cases, the appeal has gone not to the heart but to the stomach.”

-Speeches and writings of Gandhi: p.336, Feb. 14 1916

Gandhi’s reflections come out of his horrible experience as a child in India seeing people convert to Western ways in ‘Christian drag’ and not to Christ.

Some thought on mission and ‘go ye’

  1. Have others too experienced people “Go[ing] Ye…” but not making disciples, that is, students of the nonviolent way of Jesus?

Gandhi 'going ye'2. The biblical passage which Gandhi is referring to is Matthew 28:18-20. In part it reads, “teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you”. Is it the ‘mission’ of the God revealed in Jesus if we are not teaching people the practicalities of what Jesus taught? If we teach a theory of atonement and neglect to teach ‘converts’ to live Jesus’ way have we really made disciples? If we don’t teach giving to the needy in secret (instead of calling a press conference), to pray for God’s will of justice,peace and joy to be done (instead of our will or the will of our nation), to seek first God’s transforming presence (instead of careers or our agenda) to first remove the plank from our own eye (instead of judging others) and to love our enemies (instead of bombing them) have we really made followers, students, disciples of Jesus?

3. Gandhi talked about “so-called” converts where the appeal has gone not “to the heart” but “to the stomach.” In your experience do evangelists today invite people ‘take up their cross’ and follow Jesus in the way of love come what may? Or simply appeal to peoples stomachs?

4. What might it look like to prayerfully seek to embody an alternative to the “so-called conversions”, the “appeals to the stomach” and “go[ing] ye” without calling people to obedience to the ‘royal law’ of Love?

For going deeper:

what difference to mission might it make if we were to spend time meditating on Matthew 28:18-20 inlight of Matthew 5-7 while praying for a ‘conversion of the heart’. Gandhi read the Sermon on the Mount daily for his mission, how much do we for Christ’s mission?

The ‘Pioneering’ Plant

Sherry and Geoff discussed this idea of ‘pioneering plants’ with us while they were in Perth and today Sherry described it on their blog. She writes about permaculture and a book she has been reading on the subject, then goes on:

“i came across a particular recommendation in the book that interested me greatly. i think it serves as a useful, earthy anology to the apostolic work of the people of god. in a section on succession planting, the manual defines a type of plant called “pioneer species.” these plants are “selected shrubs, which can live in degraded soil, improve soil nutrients, and protect seedling trees, and are planted initially”

apparently, as other species are planted after these first inhabitants the stability of the ecosystem is strengthened. so the ability of an ecosystem to survive is based to a significant degree on the first type of species planted, a pioneering species. these initial species must be able to weather the compromised conditions of “degraded soil” in order to make the surrounding area more inhabitable for future plants.

I wonder if some of us in missionary ventures can learn from this analogy. Maybe a key quality of the pioneer is the ability to survive in difficult soil and to enable it to be more fertile for those who come after…

Thanks Sherry!

But What About Your Kids?!!

In venturing out from the familiarity of the established church environment to start again and re-imagine church, one of the core issues for Danelle and I to consider was how we would look after our children away from Sunday schools, kid’s ministries and youth groups. It’s a question overseas missionaries have been facing for years, but for most in the western world it just seems normal practice for children to learn about faith through the various mechanisms in church.

While these different ‘aids’ can be helpful and can assist parents with the discipleship of their children they can also be used as a substitute for godly parenting and thoughtful engagement with the faith development of our own kids. I am grateful that over the last few years I have been able to participate deeply in the lives of my children as they have grown to know Jesus. They are still only 6 & 4 years old but it has been great to see their faith develop and a real, albeit childlike, love for God emerge.

It was a short time ago that it dawned on me just how vital our input and role modeling is to the children we raise. On a Monday morning after making the kids breakfast I let them know I was going to spend some time in my study ‘talking to Jesus’. They have seen me do this each day and it is just part our routine now.

My 6 year old daughter Ellie, asked ‘Daddy can I talk to Jesus with you some day?’

‘Sure honey’ I answered. ‘Finish your breakfast, grab your Bible and come in!’

I began wondering what to do and how to teach my 6 year old daughter to speak to Jesus…

She arrived five minutes later with her ‘Bible for Little Hearts’, a children’s book with one verse per page. As she sat on my lap we read two verses and discussed together what they were saying to us. We then took some time to pray for the people we know. She would pray a sentence, then it was my turn and so on. After that we would stop in quietness for a minute or so and ‘listen’ to Jesus, seeing if we could hear the voice of the spirit speaking to us. (Inevitably Ellie hears God telling her that he loves her!) The whole process took just 3 or 4 minutes, but I found she came back quite regularly in the mornings to sit with me and ‘talk to Jesus’.

Then a morning came when I was heading out for breakfast and I couldn’t spend the time with her. She was concerned, wondering what she would do, when I heard her say ‘Its ok dad, I know what to do now. You can go’. As I walked out the door I saw her sitting in my office armchair with her Bible open reading a verse of scripture. It was wonderful to see that she had ‘got it’ and didn’t need me there. But the most encouraging bit was yet to come…

When I got home that afternoon my wife told me that shortly after I had left, her little brother Sam came in and asked if he could speak to Jesus too. So, knowing what to do now, Ellie placed her brother on her lap and began to teach him the same process I had gone through with her. They read scripture, prayed for friends and listened to God. She was discipling her 4 year old brother and teaching him how to encounter Jesus. I was reminded again that discipleship is not rocket science. (Danelle secretly took the photo below!)

400.jpg

I realise the teenage years are still a way off and they are always testing times, but my conviction is that the time we invest in our own children’s discipleship is the most critical time of all. We may be privileged to be part of churches with excellent programs or we may have other adults who love our kids and lead them to Jesus, but at the end of the day the biggest privilege and the greatest responsibility still rests with us.

The dislocation we have experienced as a family has actually been the catalyst in helping me discover the joy of investing in my own children. I know there are some who worry for us, that we lack the resources of a larger church, but quite honestly, I am confident that the best people any child could have to help them on a faith journey are the ones who love them most!

Are Churches really just Religious Football Clubs?

Its a bit of a sad day for Docker fans because Chris Connolly, coach of the Freo club has pulled the pin. After a pretty disastrous season he has fallen on his sword and accepted personal responsibility for the state the club is in. He will move on and Freo will try and find another Messiah to lead them to the promised land (just to mix metaphors a little)

Connolly couldn’t ‘deliver’ on the goods over the time he was at Fremantle and after much speculation he has stepped down. The underlying belief here is ‘if we get the right coach then he will enable us to win more games and ultimately we will be a premiership side‘.

It is some of the thinking that is being applied in Oz evangelical churches at the moment where if the senior pastor can’t deliver on the KPI’s of the church – which usually includes an appropriate number of conversions – then he is held responsible and asked to resign. (This is the theory, but I am yet to see any church implement it, nor any pastor resign due to his inability to deliver.) The phrase ‘back the jockey – not the horse’ is one I have heard often, used to imply that the key element in seeing churches deliver on conversion growth is the right senior pastor. I hear the rhetoric, but is any pastor really going to fall on his sword and call himself ‘incompetent’, or is any board really going to sack a faithful diligent worker because he can’t deliver conversions?

While I applaud missionary endeavour and the call to better efforts I can’t help think its a little more complex than both of these situations seem to suggest.

Can You Be Too Incarnational

Matt Stone asks some excellent questions on his blog Journeys in Between. Here he poses the one that gets asked of many missionaries…

Can you be too incarnational? – I understand this to mean ‘can you be so immersed in the world that you lose any value as a salt/light influence’?

Matt begins:

“Since Alan Hirsch has goaded me into this discussion I thought I would publish a diagram I have been working on in an effort to try and articulate my own position. In essence my answer is no, you can never be too incarnational, for properly understood that’s akin to asking whether you can be too Christlike.”

contextualization_v2_21.jpg

fiddler on the roof divx download

Read more here

As one who grew up in the ‘come apart and be separate’ world it has been a fun journey the last 7 or 8 years discovering that people ‘out there’ are not as they had been described and I have not been infected with ‘non-Christianitis’ as we once worried!

Perhaps a similar question is ‘how far is too far?’ when it comes to contextualisation. When do we actually compromise the gospel and begin leading people astray?

I guess that depends largely on how you define sin doesn’t it… and to what degree ‘sin’ is culturally determined?…

Just some light thoughts on a cool Monday morning here in Perth.

Some thoughts on missionary work in suburbia Part III

Ok so I’ve suggested several building blocks for effective missionary work here the burbs.

1. Proximity – being near people

2. Regularity – spending significant time together

3. Depth – going beyond the fluff in relationships

4. Conflict – being prepared to disagree and realise that’s ok and necessary

So here are my final two ‘building blocks’ if people are to become Jesus followers.

Building Block 5. The Message – This is where I believe some ability to articulate the gospel is essential. At some point we need to be able to share with people who we are and why we have chosen to orient our lives around Jesus Christ.

At the moment I see some interesting things happening. There is the typical conservative evangelical position that sees the gospel very much as ‘God loves, you sinned, Jesus died, you repent, all good’. I oversimplify but you get the gist. Then there is the more ’emerging’ position (for want of a better term) that says ‘hang on – there’s more to the gospel that Jesus dying for your sins’ – and gets into ecology, justice, environmentalism etc.

While one may seem a bit narrow my observation of the holistic approach to the gospel is that at times it can err on the side of being too fuzzy. It can neglect to mention the central aspect of Christ’s atonement and in that misses the mark. So while we speak of being ‘Jesus followers’ there is a requirement to understand what he calls us to and what he calls us from.

At the risk of making this sound like a specialist business, I do think it takes a bit of skill to articulate the gospel in a way that is both holistic and personal as well inviting and simultaneously repellant. By that I mean any gospel that only delivers the ‘goodies’ of eternal life and forgiveness, but doesn’t tell the whole story of ‘taking up your cross’ is ultimately doomed. There is a ‘repellant’ aspect to the gospel because it calls for self denial and that is not natural to us folks.

I do think its about here that the gift of evangelist comes into its own. That is not said to negate all of our responsibilities, but to affirm that some are created by God to do this work more specifically. For me one of the most envigorating things I ever do is talk with people about Jesus and the hope he gives to life. I could talk about Jesus, answer objections, lead people towards him all day every day and feel as happy as a pig in mud. This is where my own sense of being comes alive.

I also have a standard policy that with people who enquire respectfully and gently I respond accordingly. However if someone wants to be argumentative and difficult I will often respond to them in kind. Different people communicate in different ways and knowing what works when speaking with a person is critical.

All that said, at the end of the day we just need to be able to speak about who we are – and why. Its that simple. And if we can’t then I’d suggest we need to do some work to develop in that area.

Building Block 6 The Supernatural – I do realise the ‘supernatural’ is at work the whole time, but what I mean is simply that I cannot open anyone’s heart to the Holy Spirit.

Even after I have done ‘my bit’ it may not result in a person choosing to follow Jesus. As much as I would like my friends to share the journey with me its like trying to make someone ‘fall in love’. You just can’t force it.

So while we can do our bit ultimately it still comes down to a work of God in someone’s life that causes them to want to change the way their life is focused.

This is the bit I find hard.

The rest I can control to some degree, but this bit is totally beyond my control. But that’s a reality we need to deal with also. Does prayer influence this? Absolutely! I would hope so! So I pray for those who don’t Jesus, but it seems that sometimes God hears and responds… and sometimes well…

———————–

So – there you have it!

Hamo’s thoughts on how mission develops in suburbia.

I’d be interested to hear people’s reflections on their own experiences of trying to mission with both passion and integrity.

Some thoughts on missionary work in suburbia Part II

Proximity and regularity are hard to achieve.

Let’s face it, we can live nearby and never actually inhabit the same space. You can live next to someone for 7 years and not even speak a word. Pretty tragic, but also pretty normal. Such is life in the burbs.

But if these first two criteria aren’t in place then what comes next doesn’t have a hope in hades!

Building Block 3. Depth – Ok, so we live nearby and we see each other regularly. That’s great, but if we are to missionaries then at some point we do want to talk with people about the bigger issues of life. Purpose, destiny, meaning, coffee etc.

Personally I find it very hard to sustain relationships that never progress beyond ‘Are Holden’s better than Fords?’ I get bored… very bored! I dis-engage. I drift away. Maybe that’s not good, but its who I am. I am happy to laugh, fart and discuss the footy, but if I never feel like I am actually getting to know a person then I start to move away.

Take away the ‘missionary’ aspect of my identity and I’d be just the same. I am happy to hear about a person’s sport, family, cars, renovations and vasectomy but if after a fair length of time I never actually get to meet the human being behind all that stuff then I will find it very hard to remain interested.

I also don’t believe we can speak of issues concerning the gospel while conversations remain superficial. The gospel immediately breaks into our whole worldview and challenges our understanding of what is important. It causes us to reflect on reasons for our existence and the way we are living our lives. It really does affect everything.

I certainly don’t think you need to be Christians to have relationships with depth, but I do think depth is unlikely to come without proximity and regularity.

This is where the workplace and the street get tricky. Both are able to provide proximity and regularity, but I’d suggest the workplace isn’t a great environment to go too deep. The nature of work means that you have to see each other every day and if the relationship goes pear shaped because of more indepth conversations then it becomes tricky to function well together. I reckon everyone likes to tread carefully in this zone because a lot is at stake. The street is similar, but roller doors provide the ability to withdraw if things go sour.

And speaking of the potential for things to go sour…

Building Block 4. Conflict If we are to speak of Jesus with people who don’t know him and don’t hold the same worldview as us then we need to accept that there will be differences and probably even some conflict/disagreement. I want to clarify that the ‘conflict’ I speak of isn’t

prophet the movie download

necessarily bad. Its a healthy part of a relationship that has gone beyond the superficial and I’d suggest that if we never disagree with our friends then it probably isn’t a genuinely healthy friendship.

I’m sure Grendel won’t mind me using him as an example here. We are mates – good mates and my life is the richer for having met this weird coffee obsessed public servant who seems to be a walking encyclopedia and who is equally concerned for the health of the local community as I am. But obviously we disagree about the basic issue of the existence of God. We have spoken of this numerous times and we have listened to each other’s respective journeys and current positions.

I guess we could have just skirted over this issue, but for both of us faith, church and spirituality has shaped us significantly so it would be hard to understand one another in the absence of some conversation here – even if we don’t come out agreeing on the same stuff.

There was something about the world I grew up in that required me to continually prove a ‘Grendel’ wrong, but I don’t live in that world any more. I’m not convinced its a world any missionary should live in. Apart from the fact that two relatively intelligent people (yes I’m still referring to Grendel and I…) are unlikely to argue one another to an opposite position it doesn’t seem to be the approach Jesus would take if he lived in our community. And although Paul was an argumentative bugger I doubt he would have sought to win a verbal stoush either.

However while Grendel and I are able to sustain a healthy friendship some people will not like our choice to follow Jesus and to speak of him in conversation. Some people will simply avoid us. They won’t invite us to parties. They will classify us as ‘religious folks’. And at times that will hurt. We have had that experience up here already and I’m sure we will again.

But let’s not let the occasional rejection stop us speaking of Jesus!

And I use the words ‘speaking of Jesus’ intentionally because while actions do speak louder than words, there is still a place for the verbal communication of the gospel, for speaking of how Jesus has revolutionised our life. We don’t need to be evangelistic nutbags to speak of Jesus, (see here) but if he is in our lives then inevitably (if we are being true to who we are) he will ‘leak out’.

Truthfully I believe some of us have become so soft that the slightest ‘knock’ for being Christians causes us to withdraw and never venture down that road again.

Time to toughen up folks!!

And I don’t mean we need to be aggressive, but if we believe that our message is valuable and our calling is to share that (in part verbally) then we just need to get over our jitters and speak up.

Not everyone will like it, but that’s ok.

I tend to think that if a relationship is built on proximity, regularity and depth then it will be able to sustain some conflict. If it can’t then it probably isn’t going to very durable anyway.