I sense there is a fine line between theological conviction and theological arrogance, but its an important line.
I am impressed by conviction and drawn to it, but repelled by arrogance.
I am currently pondering the differences (spurred on by an incident this week) because I think we so easily mistake the two.
I am feeling that the primary difference lies in that conviction can be communicated with both passion and humility – and at the end of the day you don’t feel bullied by the person’s point of view, but arrogance almost always leaves you feeling like someone has assaulted you.
I know I have been guilty of arrogance in my desire to live with conviction, however I hope that with maturity there is a greater gap between the two in my own life.
Hi Andrew,
This is a challenging post. I can admit to doing the same and am constantly (hopefully) aware of this line. It’s good to be challenged – thanks.
The difference? Conviction is what I have and arrogance is what you have!
I assume you realise I am speaking in generalisations and not about you or I specifically (although a case could be made!)
deeply wounded mate!
Haven’t been in touch for a while with you mate, hope you’re doin’ fine.
Would just like to note, as someone who grew up in a family where ‘lively debate’ (viewed as aggressive assault by most others) was considered normal and positive, not EVERYONE who comes across as arrogant is actually… they might just not have yet learnt how to moderate the transmission of their views for public consumption 😛